View Single Post
  #195   Report Post  
Old May 6th 05, 04:34 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 11:20:49 -0400,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
Dave Hall (N3CVJ) wrote:
Quite contrary. Logic supports the existence of
a creator or, more generally, the concept of


intelligent design.


Science is based on logic. Nowhere does science support your position.

Well, one of two possibilities exist.



Why are you limiting yourself to two possibilities? There are a myriad
of possibilities and a certain amount of fact to support more than two
possibilities.

Either the


earth cooled, formed water, created primordial
amino acids which somehow morphed into


single celled life, which then somehow


determined the need to further specialize and


diversify, and all species evolved from there.


Somehow they knew that we'd need plants to


make oxygen, for the animals that need it.





Ummm,,,in all bio classes, we learn plant life was here before primates.

Some species would become food for others.


All of this raises many questions, the biggest


of which is what force drove these single


celled organisms to improve and specialize


themselves?



Natural selection,,,bio-evolvement.

What drives evolution? Can accidental


random mutation answer these questions


satisfactorily.




Science can. If a culture is underground for years and years, they will
take on a different appearance. Their skin would be fairer. Their eyes
would be slightly larger...and so on it goes.


The other possibility is that our existence was


carefully guided by an intelligent force.


Applying Occam's razor, which scenario is


easier to believe?



Depends if one places their core belief in faith or science.

Our whole ecosystem, the intricate


specialization of the various functions of our


bodies and other aspects of nature are far too


complex to have occurred and evolved at


random.


Now THAT is one hell of a subjective opinion.

Yes, but it based on probability.




So were the human sacrifices to the Gods, in their time. You can't
possibly believe we reached the pinnacle of all intellectualism and
physical traits. People continue to live longer, grow larger and
stronger, etc.
But keeping with that, who said it was
random? Natural evolution and selection
explains away any coincidental occurrences
that you may mistake for "random".

But what drives evolution? If random


mutations are the basis for evolution, then


what prevents "bad mutations" or several


different mutations from leading us down even
more diverse paths?




Nothing, There are plenty of "bad mutations" running around...screwed up
or damaged or incomplete chromosomes, sequences, and gray matter.
Mongoloids are but a single example..


Natural selection only answers some of those


questions.


There is simply not enough order in chaos for


this to happen.

=A0
=A0You are claiming this oxymoron (chaos in order) does not exist. I
agree.
Darwin's theory has yet to be proved because of a single missing link,
it is the most widely accepted scholarly and scientific (IE: logic,
logical) belief.

There is much scientific evidence to support


the theory of evolution. I am not trying to


discount it at all. Quite the opposite, I totally


endorse the concept of evolution. The


difference is that I believe that evolution was


"helped" along by an outside intelligence.



Christians do not believe cavemen existed as science depicts. Do you?

Dave


"Sandbagger"


n3cvj