Thread: 5.050
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 04:35 AM
Brad
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
K1MAN is justly asking why the ham press has not presented his side of
the story. Please read his editorial response below:

K1MAN EDITORIAL - ED050616 -

WHERE IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY?

You read what the FCC says about K1MAN. You read about what other
hams say about K1MAN. Where do you read about what K1MAN says?
ARRL? No! QST? No! CQ? No! World Radio! No! K1TP? No!
QRZ? No! What is wrong with this picture, you ignorant hypocrites?
No wonder the Arabs hate our guts so much. No wonder Amateur Radio
is going down the tubes, led by ARRL.



Blah blah blah.

I read the above piece of drivel on QRZ.COM, so where is the problem?
Answer - he flew into this raging tirade BEFORE it was published, not after
it was refused.

Brad.