Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 04:35 AM
Brad
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
K1MAN is justly asking why the ham press has not presented his side of
the story. Please read his editorial response below:

K1MAN EDITORIAL - ED050616 -

WHERE IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY?

You read what the FCC says about K1MAN. You read about what other
hams say about K1MAN. Where do you read about what K1MAN says?
ARRL? No! QST? No! CQ? No! World Radio! No! K1TP? No!
QRZ? No! What is wrong with this picture, you ignorant hypocrites?
No wonder the Arabs hate our guts so much. No wonder Amateur Radio
is going down the tubes, led by ARRL.



Blah blah blah.

I read the above piece of drivel on QRZ.COM, so where is the problem?
Answer - he flew into this raging tirade BEFORE it was published, not after
it was refused.

Brad.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017