Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... K1MAN is justly asking why the ham press has not presented his side of the story. Please read his editorial response below: K1MAN EDITORIAL - ED050616 - WHERE IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY? You read what the FCC says about K1MAN. You read about what other hams say about K1MAN. Where do you read about what K1MAN says? ARRL? No! QST? No! CQ? No! World Radio! No! K1TP? No! QRZ? No! What is wrong with this picture, you ignorant hypocrites? No wonder the Arabs hate our guts so much. No wonder Amateur Radio is going down the tubes, led by ARRL. Blah blah blah. I read the above piece of drivel on QRZ.COM, so where is the problem? Answer - he flew into this raging tirade BEFORE it was published, not after it was refused. Brad. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|