View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 5th 05, 03:15 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


You need help. Someone needs to get you to it since you won't go
on your own.

You are lying again but which is the lie Stevie...(SNIP)


No, I'm not lying.


yes you are


Nope.

You need help.


I do need help, in avoiding stalkers like you


I'm not a stalker.

But you ARE a liar.

You're a chronic liar and have some very serious personal issues
that need professional resolution.


I do lie when it suits me, never denied that, that I choose as is my
right to maintaina bit secracy about me is not proof of mental illness


There nothing "secrat" about you, Mark.

You're a known functioanlly illiterate pathological liar who's now
admitted to being the liar I claimed he was...

...and it's not even my birthday!

(UNSNIP)...that you carry on this
becuase you are a sadist or becuase youcareabout or is it simpleir than
that are both a lie


What?


another distortion but cutting into my words
oh Hum Stevie is back


"What?" is a distortion and "cutting into (your) words"...?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !

All that you need prehaps. since you need none at all I am sure you
have that
but you don't back it up for anyone else.

Sure I do.

As I suspect you have all you need, which may wel be none at all
The rest of us have higher standards


That you even remotely suggest that you have "higher standards" is
one of your more laughable and absolutely ludicrous assertions, Mark.


You are entitled your sense of humor


There's absolutely NOTHING funny about seeing an adult act the
way you do in public, Mark...Kinda sickening, actually.

Just wading through the abortion of writing that you dare call
English proves it.


MY english has nothing to with it


Sure it does. To call what you write "English" might be enough to
get the real English to start a war over it....

That you think it serves as proof of your standards of prrove is
eveidence of just how low those standards are.

(now wating foryour pretend you didn't understand


And just "wat" are you wating for me to prrove"...?!?!

You manage to get sentences out there, Mark, no doubt...However
it's not without a lot of work and imagination.

I've taken care of 5 year olds with better sentence construction
than you.

You refuse to do those things that would demonstrate that you are
doing those things necessary to improve and advance yourself.


You know this HOW?

you are either

ONE stlaking more closing than I am aware of

or

TWO lieing in claiming you know much about what I do


I don't have to go ANY FARTHER than the chair I am presently
reclining in to see EXACTLY what I claimed in the above is true,
Mark...You're doing NOTHING to improve yourself.

You refuse to use $10 worth of technology to clean up the "dreck"
you insist is "coherent English" here, and you act like a five year
old.

Your "standards" are lies and deceit wrapped around ignorance and
functional illiteracy.


Dysgarphia, you lying Sack of ####


Nope.

You refuse to fix it. You've been told that your "writing" is
crap and that half of what you write is unintelligigble.

The technology exists to fix it. You refuse.

Brain insisted that I was never in MARS and know nothing about it.
I made one error as it pertainted to Chief MARS, and he now claims my
lack of knowledge on MARS is "vast".

You admit to one error from experence I'd there exist at least 10
errors for every one you admit to


Then you're certainly at liberty to provide evidence of that
claim, Mark...


$ such have made in getting to this point in this post


Huh? What? Made what getting where?

You and he claim I don't give specifics.


Lie I claim you did not give proof, Brain's claims are his own affair


I did give proof. Information that any idiot could follow to
logical conclusion.

If I get arrested and the cops say "Where were you at 5PM and I
say "Joe's Bar", I don't have to produce a receipt...Just third parties
who can corroborate that I was indeed there.

Brain was given MORE than adequate information to answer his
questions.

He was just embarrssed to get the answers becasue he knew that I
wouldn't give him them knowing that the person on the other end of the
line would tell him what I've been saying all along.

so above are 2 lies.

One that I claim you did not give specifics


I did give specifics, so you are the liar.

Two that Brain and I ask for the same thing


I bet you and Brain DO ask for the same thing. Just not in
public.

There's proof in this very forum that that assertion is a lie.


which assertion? the one you made up


I've not "made up" any assertion.

Then he said, "Oh, I need "DOCUMENTATION".

And you did not provide it


Sure I did.


where?


When I gave him all the specifics pertaining to his questions.
All he had to do was copy them off and "make the calls".

He didn't do it. He's a coward. Just like you.

Whelp, he's got far more information to verify MY claims than any
he's ever provided for any claim he's ever made.


You the lazy bum you are want him to do the work of proving YOUR Claim


Nope.


yes you do see below a bit


He wanted specifics. I gave them.


Now just he wanted them can't you keep your stories straight


There's no "story to keep straight", Mark.

The information's the same no matter what.

As far as I am concerned, the information's been delivered.

I am sure you think so, don't make it so


The fact that I did it DOES make it so.


If you had whcih I see no evidence of as i said I am sure you think so,
don't make it so.


Sure it makes it so. It's in this forum's archives.

You claim to think I am marring first Todd then brain don't make it so
either


It wouldn't make it so, but it wouldn't be a surprise, either.

The fact that you and Brain try to make it appear otherwise is
laughable.


You make it apear otherwise

as to laughable you are entitled your sense of humor

You don't use our own word
you make stuff up, or you distort the context, or at best you start
assume, and if you were ever a maraine you know what ASSuME means

Nothing's made up, Mark.

You have made lots of stuff...(SNIP)


Such as...?!?!


I Stand Corrected On N9OGL/KB9RQZ Wedding...It's N0IMD/KB9RQZ...

your words not mine


But you two ARE "in bed" together...We've seen evidence of it in
this forum.

So why would it be such a stretch to see it eally happen?

(UNSNIP)...Not in position to say what you made up vs
what you distorted beyond all reason w.r.t. Brain Idon't eneough about
him


Huh?


OF course it make no sense if you snip it out of context

another of your distrotions


Snip what out of context? It was trash in the first place.

And it's "d i s t o r t i o n s", Mark. If you're going to allege
a distortion, at least spell THAT right, OK...?!?!

Even YOU have the resources to verify anything I've ever said in
this forum except that I won't discuss my combat service in the Corps.
If Lennie and Brain want to subsequently say "it didn't happen", well,
they can have fun doing it but they'd still be wrong.

A simple lie I don't have those resourses...(SNIP)


It's no lie.


it is a lie


Do you have a computer tied to the Internet, Mark?

Does it have a search engine?

Then you have the resources I said you have.

You have the resources.


nope


Yep.

principle lack is of course the time to spend chasing your BS


It's not BS.

It's facts.

Now...let's get down to what you REALLY don't have...that's
INITIATIVE.

In THAT regard I could agree with you.

What you DON'T ahve is either the guts to use them OR you really
are as ignorant as I have supposed and don't realize that you have
them.


One your spelling is slipping


Let's see...A 1 in 500 transpostion of letters as opposed to your
EVERY SENTENCE errors...

Two, It sin't...(SNIP)


See what I mean...

(UNSNIP)... a matter of guts, it is a matter of caring. I don't if
served at all. I'd rather beleive you did not, but I suspect you have,
you show enough signs of service brain washing something my own mind
never took to, thank the gods, that it is likely true


WTF did you just say...?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Three you seem to want people to beleive YOUR claims so you need to
carry the freight


"Carry the freight"...??!?! Why? I am an ER Nurse, not a FedEx
delivery guy.

As for any information I have, well, I answered the questions
asked.

Now...if BRAIN would just answer the ones that have been put to
him for YEARS.....

(UNSNIP)...not without digging for them
at best, and to say I might be able to dig out of yoour lies and
obfucations the data is being generous in assuimng that your aren't
lying win saying I can.


There's nothing for ME to "dig out of", Mark.


If there is nothing to dig out then I lack the resources to verfy your
claims


You obviously have a computer tied to the Internet, blockhead.

I've not lied about anything.


you sure have


Nope.

again

I Stand Corrected On N9OGL/KB9RQZ Wedding...It's N0IMD/KB9RQZ...

your words and another lie


There's a difference between sarcasm and lying.

Again, you can't seperate the two, which makes you even more
idiotic appearing.


And you're right about ONE thing...ME granting that YOU can "do"
something IS being generous.


another lie and an easy one. You know I can do something therefore it
is not generous of you to admit that


Allow me to correct myself then...

It's generous for me to grant that you can do something CORRECTLY.

But I digress it is not MY job to prove YOUR Claims. It is not Brain or
Lennies Job either. They are YOUR claims YOU back em up


I've already given the dates, times, places, callsigns, etc.


Not that I have found


That's because you're an idiot, Mark.

Even Brain has admitted that the data was put here before him.

He just refuses to accept it.

That doesn't make it any less factual. It just makes him that
much more cowardly to verify it.

so

But (again) I digress it is not MY job to prove YOUR Claims. It is not
Brain or Lennies Job either. They are YOUR claims YOU back em up


I did.

I gave specific dates, times, locations, callsigns, etc.

As your Claims of comabt if memory serves (and it may not) you claims
to have served under a General with REALLY big ego problems (to go with
a his military skills) MacArther when the Chinesse entered that war,
not that I neccesaly believe it that but as I recal that was one of
your claims


I have been in combat. I don't discuss it here.


maybe maybe not


No maybe not.

And EVERY man and woman in uniform serves under a general in their
military career from the day they get off the bus at boot camp. (Gee
"Colonel", you didn't KNOW that...?!?!


of course I know which of course has nothing to do with I said, but if
you red I mentioned that I seem to recall you claiming to serve a
particular General


I ahv served many "particular General(s)" in almost 20 years...

No ego. Fact.


Doug Mac Arthur had enough ego for 10 generals, as well as, being quite
a soldier


And having been deceased before I was ever in uniform, never in my
chain of command, not that an Army officer, save for the CJCS, would
have been.

Now I will never try to stop you from making an ### of yourself, that
is your right, but you don't have the right to make others make the
trip with you

Coming from the "Drafted At Age Eight And They Won't Let Me Resign
Colonel In The Chemical Corps..."...?!?!?!

Never said any such thing, the above is your distortion of what I have
said, it is your straw man, you made up claim. as result BTW your
presuming that YOU can dictate how people use the english language


It's absolutely NOT a "distortion".


Yes it is a distortion


No, It's not.

YOU said you were drafted.

According to the age that was once on your QRZ listing, you would
have only been 8 or 9 when the draft ended.

You claimed you were drafted.


yes indeed, but I was using the words in a different sense than you


Then you were being deceitful.

There's only one "sense" when applied to military service, and
"drafted" means the non-volunteer conscripting into military service.

You claimed you were a field grade officer.

You then claimed you were a company grade officer.


yep you got those 2 right


I got is ALL right.

You lied. You've BEEN lying.

You followed that up by claiming that your "comandig oficer"
refused to release you from active duty becasue your MOS was so
"critcal"


Never said anything about my "comandig oficer" never had one


Then you've lied again.

There's one and ONLY one military person in the United States who
has no "commanding officer"...that's the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff..That's becasue he only answers to the President of the United
States.

And never said anything about refusing to discharge me form ACTIVE duty
at all
you just assumed it


No.

You said it.

I did some digging and found...

...nothing. You never served a day in the Armed Forces of the
United States as either Enlisted or Officer, Active, Reserve or Guard.


You found this with my precise name Social secruity numberor address.
my my


I didn't need it.

Going back to 1935, there was only three "Mark C Morgan" who had
served as of my research on you (1997). All were born in the 1930's or
40's.

You even claimed that there was Nobody name Mark Morgan ever in the
Army


No, I didn't.

I claimed there was no Mark C Morgan who could have been you. Not
at your presently claimed age, anyway...

When I bust THAT bubble you tried the "I was using a fake name"
routine.


not exactly but that is closer than you normaly get


It's right on the money, as is just about everything I get with
you, getting as close as your abuse of the language will let me get.

Let's just face it...

Mrs Mark C Morgan is married to a chronic liar.


yes my partner is, my partnar knows that, and my partner is gald I lie
well enough that a jerk like can't find me


I know where you are, Markie...Close enough to find you within an
hour if I ever found myself in Michigan and looking for a good laugh.

Huge snip of Markie trash.......................

Guess you ought to look at QRZ and see how my name's spelled,
Mark. Of course I know accuracy and truth are not your strong suits.

I simply have trusted that you were not lying about the spelling of
your name, and what is on your FCC and your real name are not going to
be revailed by a QRZ search


No, Mark...YOU are the "this is a fake name" specialist. (Brain
and Lennie are close seconds with numerous screen names or
nomme-de-guerre's...)


You make an issue of Changing ISP's Stevie. Why? is't shoping around
for a better deal a good thing


There's a difference behind "shopping around" and misrepresenting
your identity.

Stop lying. You're not any good at it.


Never, and I do well enough that you haven't even found to thread to
pul that leads to me


What? Huh?

Steve, K4YZ