K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
just what are saying you did
How can we "discuss" anything, Markie, when you are still refusing
to get help for your alleged dyslexia?
Stevie I don't need help, I could use for you cut down on the sheer
volume that would help
I do cut down on the volume.
steveie you are not cutting the volume you are incresing it
You've not been paying attention.
I have indeed I have been giving you more attention than you deserve,
practicing my skills at dealing with narrowminded jerks (one of the big
reason for coming to RRAP these days)
but you haven't been saying much anything
You are at liberty to validate the information independently.
thank you I think
You're welcome and no you don't.
yes I do think
No, you do not.
yes I do
I don't know exactly what you are claiming
Then go back through old RRAP archives and do some research
I have can't find it
You can't find RRAP archives?
can't find what you are reffering to
of course part of that is I do not know exactly what you are reffering
to which makes reconizing it really hard
What an idiot.
another stevie distorion
How many do I have to say that before you understand
So you're admitting you're computer illiterate too...?!?!
nope
Sheesh. Are there no bounds to your limitations...?!?!
(Chew on that Mobius Loop for a while!)
Mobius has nothing do with it
you tell me to look for something without giving me enough to id it in
the first place
so without knowing what I am checking I can't check on it
I just gave you some of the details.
Callsigns.
Proving WHAT?
Having a MARS callsign doesn't proof you did anything with MARS or that
you Know anything about MARS
Otherwise you have to accept that MY callsign make me an expert on the
ARS
They "prove" I was a member. Further information can be gleaned
from there.
If they are yours, and If you did what you were suposed to and if
records are maintianed and IF they can be accessed
What does "The fact that I was NCOIC of MCB Camp Butler MARS and ANCOIC
of Oki Areawide MARS proves it." prove
The statement itself proves nothing.
That the USMC can validate my service does.
to what end I do believe you were military likely a marine
but what does it have to do with the callsigns
(Sheesh...)
what does it have to do with the cal signs
Markie, it's in the archives...Just like the rules you couldn't
find about the 60 meter allocations "weren't" in Part 97.
They are not it a text put out by the FCC if you follow one set of link
Hans then points out a Defferent links that do
What in the Blue Blazes was that supposed to be...????
what you are claiming is something Id like to knwo as a matter of
record
you are confused good makes 2 of us
If I could just understand what you were writing, it would be a lot
easier.
if you would come up and make repaet the claims you claim to be proving
the rest of us could judge wether or not you had done so. but...
But nothing. Go back and read them.
go read what I can't tell which claims you claim are answered by
callsigns
YOU are confused becasue you're a lazy idiot.
prehaps, but I am confused by your refusual to says what you are
claimingwhile offering proof of a claim you refuse to repeat
I refuse to repeat all the goings-on between Brain and I for the
last 6 months.
you refuse to repeat the claim that began it, likely because it would
seem so petty that you have been carrying on about it for 6 months
after all you are still carrying on about my changing ISP's after 7
years
Ask him. Maybe he'll e-mail you the links.
I bet HIS ISP doesn't chage him $5/hr.
I had not read this yet see
You never let anything drop
Brain insists I've not had experience in MARS. I say I have, and
have provided information to corroborate it.
no you have not even if those are valid Mars Callsign (not disputing
that yet but reserving the right) proves nothing without some kind of
logs.
MARS maintains participation reports.
accessable to the public how?
By the Same Stanard the existance of MY callsign proves I know how the
NTS works, since I don't your logic seem flawed, at best
No, it doesn't.
yes it does
I would hope that MARS does not keep and is not able to sort though
such trivia, (although it might be so foolish it has something to do
with the Military)
Records of previous memebers is "trivia"...???
yes
wether or not you serv and how meesages you may have passed is trivia.
BIG SNIP
Markie...If you want to participate in this exchange, why don't
you spend a day or two going back through old archives to bring
yourself up-to-speed on what's going on...?!?!
I have. the fact is you don't make anymore sense in storage than in
real time
I make far greater sense in ANY time than you do.
even granting that , you just hem and haw and refuse to answer you use
words games to point I can't follow you or find just what you are
reffering to
Because it's months and months of posts, and I'm not going to
repeat it all here when you can spend some of your daylight hours
reading it for yourself.
no it would be simple
and it matters when I read your post? what are they typed with?
Still not getting it, are you?
repating yourself does not make you turthful
Maybe YOU like "repating" yourself, Markie...
not esp, but you leave me few choices
Matter of fact, I bet that "partner" of yours is just beyond your
wrists.
More about my sex life? and you deny being obsessesed?
It would be a fact.
it would also be a fact its facthood does not alter it's status as a
claim
Learn English
I already have.
then use it
I wish YOU would.
I do
Google is the Archive of RRAP
It's not about RRAP, Markie.
yes it is
Then you're completely lost, Markie.
yes lost in your bull####
Still can't communicate without the profanity, eh?
was geting anywhere without so decided to try using it no better result
no worse either
and it is vulgarity not profanity
ENGLISH, MARKIE! Use complete sentences with proper format and
punctuation, please.
you LEARN English learn the meaning of the words Claim and Fact for a
start
Already know them.
no you don't
you tell me to look for your claims in RRAP archives then tell me it
isn't there
you use logic and plain reason
I do use logic and plain reason.
nope
YOU don't keep track of what's being said. I can't help that.
you keep changing your stories
worse than John Kerry
Know how I know, Markie?
Because I am already competent in it's use and comprehension.
You would have known that had you been too!
I just did not bother
Lazy punk...Just like I said.
right I am too lazy to dance your dance, do your work, carry your
freight
you generate so much drivel I can't afford the time to care about ####
like that
The divvel's in Michigan.
nope it is in RRAP
Nope, but that is not the exaplanation. I know as they do that to keep
the ARES folks providing what help they are you have to feed their
egos. Therefore as is their duty to Nation they are lying or if you
prefer egaeratinng the role of ARES
What was THAT spiel, Markie?
the truth as best I know it
Then you don't know what's "best", Markie.
but I know how the goverment works
No you don't.
yes I do
Just ill-prepared opinion unsubstantiated by facts.
well prepared but unsupported by any facts i have presented
You've not presented any facts.
right I said that Stevie
Why present no facts becuase you are not listening anyway
Why should I listen when this is a visual media?
since you can't seem to read thought it might help to listen
You're claiming that it's the "duty" of the Red Cross, etc etc to
LIE to the country just to validate the existance of ARES...?!?!
yes indeed
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Kayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.........
As it was the Duty of FDR to nation to tell lies about Lend lease and
cash and cary in order to ready the USA for WW2. FDR was one of the
biggest liars to hold that office, and I bless him for hoving the
courage to do his duty even if by lies and deceit
WHAT AN IDIOT!~
I reiterate....
WHAT AN IDIOT!
not at all a valid representation fo History
You're right...Nothing you've said is a valid representation of
history.
more stevie distrtion I have accurately describe FDR's terms in office
Then WHY did you lie in the first place?
did not lie
From their statement one may infer that they recieve net benifit from
ARES but not the degree of that benifit
Completely incoherent, Markie.
not realy just expressing a type of thought you can't follow
You mean the illogical type? No kidding.
no a type of logic that escapes you
It's not "logic" of ANY kind, other than chaotic.
progress boyo
Try again.
nope
Lazy punk.
narrowminded fool
Yes, you are. I stand corrected.
you are the narrow minded fool stevie
so stuck in a box that you can't even see it
You're just too lazy to spend the time.
I don't have a supply of time to chase down something you will not make
clear what you claim it will result in
In other words: You're just too lazy to spend the time.
No you are too lazy to do your work
Just like your rudeness to Hans. You want things one way, spoon
fed to you, and anything less is "condescending"
if you like
I am just defferent
Oh, you're "defferent", OK...
mighty generous of you
You're looking even MORE ignorant than usual!
On the otherhand, we're still waiting for the name of your
"commander", where those "unlicesed devices" play such a major role in
emergency comms, who allegedly chased the NCT's away and where they
have allegedly gone...
Thanks, Markie. Always a pleasure proving you wrong.
BUZZ worng answer you did not type that use have in that post including
it in reply when I it reamins unclear who typed does not count
Absolutely incoherent.
perfectly
Perfectly incoherent.
prefectly clear to anyone with a brain
No, it's not.
like I said elsewhere you need a brain that lest you out
I don't waste my time that way steve
Sure you do. Your whole life is a waste of time.
right at least I have a life
Uh huh..riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...Sacrificing chickens and using
your "Hook On Phonics" kit to hold your beer and TV Dinner.
more pagan bashing, and bile
Steve, K4YZ
|