Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Sep 1, 3:37 am
There's truth that the four morsemen have tried through intimidation,
personal attacks, and talk of moderating the group and excluding
non-amateurs.
By all appearances, the "Four Morsemen of the Apocalypse" want to
exclude all but PCTAs in this newsgroup.
There's one of your deliberate misstatements, Leonard.
That's merely your wrong opinion. I happen to agree with Len.
They do so with charges of "stupidity" and "errors" and some
uncivil remarks including labels of "piranha" and "Foghorn Lenhorn"
and "little electrolytic acolyte" and other endearing terms.
Len, you've invented more rude names for folks than any person here.
You started out as windy, insulting, condescending and pontificating.
It went downhill from there. Poor baby. Tsk, tsk. :-) :-)
David, you've started out as you've ended up. Smug.
Then
they get upset by others calling them names. The PCTA extra Double
Standard is always invoked in their postings.
...and there's one of your factual errors.
Case in point is James Miccolis constant statement of "that's
just plain wrong" in regards to others' opinions...as if he were
the sole judge of what is right and wrong.
You know, Leonard, it's funny that when Jim uses that phrase, you almost
always turn out to be just plain wrong.
Len has never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. As far as I
know, only you hold that distinction and title.
Then there is his
(macro) paragraph of denunciation of my postings with uncivil
terms in it, repeated and repeated on his whim.
I don't see that profile of your likely actions to be a denunciation at
all. It reads like an accurate summary of your actions. All anyone has
to do is look at N2EY's profile and compare it with archives of your
past posts. Any reader can make a judgement as to whether the profile
is accurate or inaccurate.
Yours is smug.
By the way, tell us who was discussing moderating and closing the
newsgroup to non-hams and for what purpose.
Do your own homework.
My homework? You made mention of something but you don't care to be
specific. The matter remains unsubstantiated by you.
best of luck.
Heil forgets that I've openly SUGGESTED to the PCTA to get their own
MODERATED newsgroup.
I haven't forgotten. Brian Burke may have though. He seems to think it
was some sort of PCTA plot.
Then I stand corrected on that single point. However, Jim, Kelly,
RE-4YZ, and you repeatedly post that Len is not an amateur. The
purpose is to discredit Len's opinions, without considering his
opinions on their own merit. Luckily, we have a government body that
is not bound by such absurdity.
That way they can be assured of proper Group
Think and not be bothered by opposing opinions from non-PCTA folk.
Do you really think that any self-respecting radio amateur would let a
non-ham tell us to go away from a newsgroup dealing with amateur radio?
You've probably gathered that it won't happen.
Eternal hope shines brightly.
This newsgroup is UNmoderated and that is how most feel it should
be.
No kidding? Really?
Really, and without kidding.
But...Heil is easily upset and so he must VENT in here.
What accounts for non-radio amateur Anderson's VENTING in here? You've
haunted an amateur radio newsgroup for close to a decade. You weren't a
radio amateur back then and you aren't a radio amateur now.
Hmmmm? Why would Heil make such a statement?
I'll bet
you've retold your fascinating tale of BIG TIME HF work at ADA over
fifty times. It is a story having nothing to do with amateur radio and
everything to do with Len Anderson's desire to be recognized as
somebody. Well, you're certainly recognized, Len.
I especially like Jim's recounting amateur radio's contributions during
WWII when there was no legal amateur radio operations in the USA. He
cracks me up.
Lacking
valid arguments on SUBJECTS he attempts personal attack by constant
reference to non-licensed amateurs' postings as if those were "not
allowed." Heil acts the bigot on newsgroup participation.
I've never ever said anything about your postings not being allowed. I
have stated that I don't give them any credence and I've suggested that
others might want to discount the rantings of an old gent with no
experience in amateur radio. You've gone way, way beyond that. You
have, in comments to the FCC, said that they should disregard the
comments of several radio amateurs. You're pathetic.
Hmmm? You can ask folks to ignore Len, but Len cannot?
Heil (who claims to be a linguist of Hunnish) forgot, in another
post, that the fictious name of "Dudley" was used by author Earnest
K. Gann in his book, "Fate Is The Hunter." [my mention in here]
Frank Gilliland and I used another fictitious name of "Dudly" in
reference to another, a military pretender in here. There was no
misspelling of "Dudley" at all, just the use of "Dudly" to
differentiate from Gann's original name use. A shortened form of
"Dudly" is "Dud" which also fits that other, the pretender.
I see. It must be like your use of "Atila" to differentiate between the
real "Attila" and your use of "beligerent" to differentiate between real
warlike "belligerants". The name "Dudley" is an actual name. The name
"Dudly" doesn't exist. Very UNPROFESSIONAL, Leonard; very UNPROFESSIONAL.
It's less unprofessional than working out of band Frenchmen on 6
meters, IMHO.
You can tell the Mrs. that those dratted hams aren't giving you any
respect again.
Dave K8MN
One ham isn't. Never has. Too smug to be bothered by a non-ham.
Luckily we have a government organization....