| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
September 2nd 05, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Sep 1, 3:37 am There's truth that the four morsemen have tried through intimidation, personal attacks, and talk of moderating the group and excluding non-amateurs. By all appearances, the "Four Morsemen of the Apocalypse" want to exclude all but PCTAs in this newsgroup. There's one of your deliberate misstatements, Leonard. That's merely your wrong opinion. I happen to agree with Len. They do so with charges of "stupidity" and "errors" and some uncivil remarks including labels of "piranha" and "Foghorn Lenhorn" and "little electrolytic acolyte" and other endearing terms. Len, you've invented more rude names for folks than any person here. You started out as windy, insulting, condescending and pontificating. It went downhill from there. Poor baby. Tsk, tsk. :-) :-) David, you've started out as you've ended up. Smug. Then they get upset by others calling them names. The PCTA extra Double Standard is always invoked in their postings. ...and there's one of your factual errors. Case in point is James Miccolis constant statement of "that's just plain wrong" in regards to others' opinions...as if he were the sole judge of what is right and wrong. You know, Leonard, it's funny that when Jim uses that phrase, you almost always turn out to be just plain wrong. Len has never worked out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. As far as I know, only you hold that distinction and title. Then there is his (macro) paragraph of denunciation of my postings with uncivil terms in it, repeated and repeated on his whim. I don't see that profile of your likely actions to be a denunciation at all. It reads like an accurate summary of your actions. All anyone has to do is look at N2EY's profile and compare it with archives of your past posts. Any reader can make a judgement as to whether the profile is accurate or inaccurate. Yours is smug. By the way, tell us who was discussing moderating and closing the newsgroup to non-hams and for what purpose. Do your own homework. My homework? You made mention of something but you don't care to be specific. The matter remains unsubstantiated by you. best of luck. Heil forgets that I've openly SUGGESTED to the PCTA to get their own MODERATED newsgroup. I haven't forgotten. Brian Burke may have though. He seems to think it was some sort of PCTA plot. Then I stand corrected on that single point. However, Jim, Kelly, RE-4YZ, and you repeatedly post that Len is not an amateur. The purpose is to discredit Len's opinions, without considering his opinions on their own merit. Luckily, we have a government body that is not bound by such absurdity. That way they can be assured of proper Group Think and not be bothered by opposing opinions from non-PCTA folk. Do you really think that any self-respecting radio amateur would let a non-ham tell us to go away from a newsgroup dealing with amateur radio? You've probably gathered that it won't happen. Eternal hope shines brightly. This newsgroup is UNmoderated and that is how most feel it should be. No kidding? Really? Really, and without kidding. But...Heil is easily upset and so he must VENT in here. What accounts for non-radio amateur Anderson's VENTING in here? You've haunted an amateur radio newsgroup for close to a decade. You weren't a radio amateur back then and you aren't a radio amateur now. Hmmmm? Why would Heil make such a statement? I'll bet you've retold your fascinating tale of BIG TIME HF work at ADA over fifty times. It is a story having nothing to do with amateur radio and everything to do with Len Anderson's desire to be recognized as somebody. Well, you're certainly recognized, Len. I especially like Jim's recounting amateur radio's contributions during WWII when there was no legal amateur radio operations in the USA. He cracks me up. Lacking valid arguments on SUBJECTS he attempts personal attack by constant reference to non-licensed amateurs' postings as if those were "not allowed." Heil acts the bigot on newsgroup participation. I've never ever said anything about your postings not being allowed. I have stated that I don't give them any credence and I've suggested that others might want to discount the rantings of an old gent with no experience in amateur radio. You've gone way, way beyond that. You have, in comments to the FCC, said that they should disregard the comments of several radio amateurs. You're pathetic. Hmmm? You can ask folks to ignore Len, but Len cannot? Heil (who claims to be a linguist of Hunnish) forgot, in another post, that the fictious name of "Dudley" was used by author Earnest K. Gann in his book, "Fate Is The Hunter." [my mention in here] Frank Gilliland and I used another fictitious name of "Dudly" in reference to another, a military pretender in here. There was no misspelling of "Dudley" at all, just the use of "Dudly" to differentiate from Gann's original name use. A shortened form of "Dudly" is "Dud" which also fits that other, the pretender. I see. It must be like your use of "Atila" to differentiate between the real "Attila" and your use of "beligerent" to differentiate between real warlike "belligerants". The name "Dudley" is an actual name. The name "Dudly" doesn't exist. Very UNPROFESSIONAL, Leonard; very UNPROFESSIONAL. It's less unprofessional than working out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters, IMHO. You can tell the Mrs. that those dratted hams aren't giving you any respect again. Dave K8MN One ham isn't. Never has. Too smug to be bothered by a non-ham. Luckily we have a government organization.... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| K8CPA Email | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
