N9OGL wrote:

The rules should also apply to W1AW who has also caused malicious
interference.


Todd,

If you substitute "incidental" or "unintentional" for your use of
*malicious*, I might agree with your premise, at least on the surface.
However...

N9OGL wrote:

The problem is W1AW is allowed to interfere with on going
transmissions and K1MAN isn't.

....the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

-73-
Carter
K8VT