Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 05, 09:55 PM
Carter-K8VT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N9OGL wrote:

The rules should also apply to W1AW who has also caused malicious
interference.



Todd,

If you substitute "incidental" or "unintentional" for your use of
*malicious*, I might agree with your premise, at least on the surface.
However...

N9OGL wrote:

The problem is W1AW is allowed to interfere with on going
transmissions and K1MAN isn't.


....the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

-73-
Carter
K8VT
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 05, 11:52 PM
Cmdr Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Carter-K8VT wrote:



...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.


Toddyboy can't relate to what you are saying, he wants to be another
K1MAN and 'broadcast'.
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 01:17 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That gal who works for Bell South and she is working on the house next
door to me when she gets off work,getting ready to move into the house
she is buying,, she is A OK.Just before dark this evening,I took my dog
out in my front yard for a few minutes.A couple of minutes later,the
Bell South gal (she is single too) was backing her car out of her drive
way,going somewhere,,, I told her I am going to move my old Jeep (1942
Willys World War Two Jeep) over in my back yard in a day or two.(I have
been having it parked catty corner at the back porch of her house for
about two years) She said,that's alright,you can leave it parked there
if you want to,I might try to talk you out of it.
cuhulin

  #4   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 01:29 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.


doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00

  #5   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 04:05 AM
Al Klein
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:

my view is that all who cause interference should pay.


The FCC doesn't share your view.


  #6   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 08:03 AM
Cmdr Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Al Klein wrote:
On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:


my view is that all who cause interference should pay.



The FCC doesn't share your view.



And it's the FCC's view that counts, toddyboys view doesn't count for
anything.
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 27th 05, 01:39 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.


doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00


I have decided to start a new net....I pick 14.321. I will be replaying
ARRL bulletins and information from RAIN. Then claim it as original. I
will also be using a prompt from Walter Cronkike, even tho his lawyers
asked me to stop.

Then if anyone interferes with me I will send out "Felony affidavits".

What you think Toad? Looks like your future to me.

Dan/W4NTI


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher General 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Policy 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Scanner 104 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
SW broadcaster at 3965, should it be there? Robert Casey Policy 1 October 3rd 04 11:31 AM
Parody of a SW broadcaster Al Patrick Shortwave 0 July 31st 03 05:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017