On 26 Oct 2005 17:51:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Ah........So it's "wrong" to ask for a poster to clarify their
position.
no never said that

but once or twice is fine to ask but when repated

..We're just supposed to look at all the pretty letters and
numbers then wonder?

no you don't have to do that either

Are you saying that I
should just shut up and not ask questions?


it is his count so he makes the rules he will use

I'm just asking for explanations of those rules.

again and again and again

Lennie ignores his request to clarify his parameters again and
again and again.

agreed Len has choosen to do so

Jim knows it and continues to ask

Len is under no obligation to answer your questions of anyone else if
he chooses not

Sure he's under an "obligation".
no he is not

that is bald faced lie on your part


He posts here voluntarily, ergo
if he wants his "point" understood, he needs to explain the rationale
for his numbers.

wrong again

and there is no point in him explaining them to you or Jim I have
asked and he has answered my questions

I say again Len is under no obligation to answer your question or
anyone elses


To fail to do so is to just spam the NG with useless rhetoric.

not at all


Not that THAT is anything new for Lennie......

Is that not allowed?

apeartly len chooses to exercise his right to state by his refusal to
answer to make exactly that determination

"Apparently"

In other words he can't do it. Lennie's clueless.

another lie Stevie he chooses not to answer those he deems are not
into real discusion


As are you in your defense of him.

wrong again


It is his count, his rules, and he is NOT accountable to you, or me or
even the FCC or Father Chrismass for that matter

But he presumes to have us understand his numbers.

I am sure Len does not expect you or Jim to understand his number

He went to a
lot of work to prepare and post them.

yes he did


WHY THEN, would he subsequently "refuse" to explain the rationale
behind his work?

becuase he felt the questions were unworthy
cuting rant
Is it somehow not "grown up" to
ask questions about what those rules are?

what you are doing, by going on and one about is interfere with others
find the results of his work

But you can't find the "results of his work" if there's no common
standard in how the numbers were assayed, Markie.

his stabdards are clear enough I don't agree with all of them but they
are his standards

cut out of mercy to us all

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account