| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
October 27th 05, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
On 26 Oct 2005 17:51:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote: wrote: grow up What does that mean in this context? in this context it means either do your own countor shut up Ah........So it's "wrong" to ask for a poster to clarify their position. no never said that but once or twice is fine to ask but when repated ..We're just supposed to look at all the pretty letters and numbers then wonder? no you don't have to do that either Are you saying that I should just shut up and not ask questions? it is his count so he makes the rules he will use I'm just asking for explanations of those rules. again and again and again Lennie ignores his request to clarify his parameters again and again and again. agreed Len has choosen to do so Jim knows it and continues to ask Len is under no obligation to answer your questions of anyone else if he chooses not Sure he's under an "obligation". no he is not that is bald faced lie on your part He posts here voluntarily, ergo if he wants his "point" understood, he needs to explain the rationale for his numbers. wrong again and there is no point in him explaining them to you or Jim I have asked and he has answered my questions I say again Len is under no obligation to answer your question or anyone elses To fail to do so is to just spam the NG with useless rhetoric. not at all Not that THAT is anything new for Lennie...... Is that not allowed? apeartly len chooses to exercise his right to state by his refusal to answer to make exactly that determination "Apparently" In other words he can't do it. Lennie's clueless. another lie Stevie he chooses not to answer those he deems are not into real discusion As are you in your defense of him. wrong again It is his count, his rules, and he is NOT accountable to you, or me or even the FCC or Father Chrismass for that matter But he presumes to have us understand his numbers. I am sure Len does not expect you or Jim to understand his number He went to a lot of work to prepare and post them. yes he did WHY THEN, would he subsequently "refuse" to explain the rationale behind his work? becuase he felt the questions were unworthy cuting rant Is it somehow not "grown up" to ask questions about what those rules are? what you are doing, by going on and one about is interfere with others find the results of his work But you can't find the "results of his work" if there's no common standard in how the numbers were assayed, Markie. his stabdards are clear enough I don't agree with all of them but they are his standards cut out of mercy to us all _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
| Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
| Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
