On 26 Oct 2005 18:03:12 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 22 Oct 2005 05:51:41 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

no

but he does npt have to answer any questions

"not"

Then to NOT clarify his work is to admit that it's not prepared in
any remotely scientific manner, which is to say that it's just a lot of
bufoonery.

not at all

it more a matter of thinking the questioners to be buffons

cut
Len is under no obligation to answer your questions of anyone
else if he chooses not

That's right. But if he ignores questions on how his numbers
were derived, why should we accept those numbers as valid?

then don't accept them as valid

But why?

Lennie went to a lot of effort to make these posts in order to
validate his points.

but not to you or jim

Why then would he NOT want anyone to understand his "work"...?!?!

why should he care if you understand his work?

you are not interested in facts you never have been

Len isn't the only one counting the comments, btw.

Is that not allowed?

apeartly len chooses to exercise his right to state by his
refusal to answer to make exactly that determination

??

Are you saying that if Len doesn't answer questions,
then I don't have the right to ask questions?

never siad you lacked the right

"said"

No...You didn't "say" it...You just told Jim to shut up.

yes I did

i told he wasn't going to get his answers and he should stop going on
about it

never sadi he did not have the right to ignore that request

cuttng the raving of the nutjob

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account