Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Oct 2005 18:03:12 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 22 Oct 2005 05:51:41 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote: wrote: grow up What does that mean in this context? in this context it means either do your own countor shut up Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any questions? no but he does npt have to answer any questions "not" Then to NOT clarify his work is to admit that it's not prepared in any remotely scientific manner, which is to say that it's just a lot of bufoonery. not at all it more a matter of thinking the questioners to be buffons cut Len is under no obligation to answer your questions of anyone else if he chooses not That's right. But if he ignores questions on how his numbers were derived, why should we accept those numbers as valid? then don't accept them as valid But why? Lennie went to a lot of effort to make these posts in order to validate his points. but not to you or jim Why then would he NOT want anyone to understand his "work"...?!?! why should he care if you understand his work? you are not interested in facts you never have been Len isn't the only one counting the comments, btw. Is that not allowed? apeartly len chooses to exercise his right to state by his refusal to answer to make exactly that determination ?? Are you saying that if Len doesn't answer questions, then I don't have the right to ask questions? never siad you lacked the right "said" No...You didn't "say" it...You just told Jim to shut up. yes I did i told he wasn't going to get his answers and he should stop going on about it never sadi he did not have the right to ignore that request cuttng the raving of the nutjob _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy |