View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 8th 05, 04:06 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Day 1 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:05:19 GMT, "Bill Sohl"
wrote:


"an_old_friend" wrote in message
roups.com...

Bill Sohl wrote:
Forget all the "my survey of comments analysis"
is more accurate than yours... Consider the following
question/challenge:

In all of the procode test arguments and comments has
even one NEW reason to retain code testiing been
offered?


I Have not seen one But then I make no claim
to have read em all (my
tolerance for crap ran out too fast)

Forget even if such an argument is valid or
compelling in any way...I'm looking for any argument
not previously raised and dismissed by or in past
FCC commentary (NPRMs, R&Os, etc.)


Indeed if there was one I suspect it would delay the R&O no matter how
of the wall it was

My short answer (and I'll be the first to say I
haven't read all comments) is that there are no
new arguments raised... because if there had been
we'd have seen it or them by now.


Just about 24 hours since I posted my challeneg and nothing
new has been offered up.


Please Bll don't hold your breth waiting waiting I like you

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account