Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:05:19 GMT, "Bill Sohl"
wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message roups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: Forget all the "my survey of comments analysis" is more accurate than yours... Consider the following question/challenge: In all of the procode test arguments and comments has even one NEW reason to retain code testiing been offered? I Have not seen one But then I make no claim to have read em all (my tolerance for crap ran out too fast) Forget even if such an argument is valid or compelling in any way...I'm looking for any argument not previously raised and dismissed by or in past FCC commentary (NPRMs, R&Os, etc.) Indeed if there was one I suspect it would delay the R&O no matter how of the wall it was My short answer (and I'll be the first to say I haven't read all comments) is that there are no new arguments raised... because if there had been we'd have seen it or them by now. Just about 24 hours since I posted my challeneg and nothing new has been offered up. Please Bll don't hold your breth waiting waiting I like you Cheers, Bill K2UNK _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |