Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
cut
How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs?
no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what
became your spliting of hairs
Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case.
what case?
Are you narcoleptic?
no
Do you recall my comments about your imprecision
with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting".
wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc
termed Dyslexiod aphasia
I used the terms pricisely
cut
I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise.
you think that would be newsflash right
I think it would be newsflash? No, I think you may be in for a surprise.
you thinking would be the newsflash
I might be in for a suprise but I can see how Stevie or BoN can claim
that who I may have sex with allows Stevie to say I have AIDS
Dave heil can think stop the presses
Okay, I've thought, "stop the presses". Did it happen?
nope becuase you failed to think
the LAW say the issues you claim are not important
What issues did I claim are not important?
you did not
I did
but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality
both are legaly irrelevant in this matter
I expect TN to obey its own laws
Oh, I'd expect that it does.
as do I
But if you don't think that anyone there
would be interested in who is submitting a complaint and why,
I am sure they will curious, but I expect them to be profesional in the
end don't you?
I think
you are going to be surprised.
no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues"
since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie
actions
in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance
You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have
enacted?
not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe
that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some
extent.
I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its
imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are
"defferent" in some way
Your past fabrications
regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics,
what lies on other topics?
C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied
about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've
lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are
records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered.
wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying
No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying.
yes you do
Lying is lying and
you've done it time and again.
yes I have so have you and so has Stevie
You aren't credible.
Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you.
you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to
income
Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected
sex, that I have admited to child mosting
we are on the same footing
There are archived
posts which prove that you've lied.
as their are for Stevie lots of them
I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that
have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it
Yes, you certainly have lied.
agreed
cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped
how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie
about medical matters?
Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here?
that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide
I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion
he is acting in medical capcity
as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is
is
as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act
professionaly he is
the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly
If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his
license
if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done
how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can
try to frighten someon into not reporting him?
I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting
him.
then you have not been reading
I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take
place after you've done so.
and he is lying about it
deal with reality Dave if you can
Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality.
right you don't think but I knew that
cut
You've lied about your work.
Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army?
yes
cutting unsuported bs
You've lied about your income.
no i have not
I have never stated my income you dolt
Haven't you?
no I have not
therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within
such a statement
So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said
anything?
not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made
You've lied about your trained pool of
typists.
nope
Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of
typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type
something up because of the expense of paying her.
never said that
I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it
that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of
assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the
first statement and run off from there
You're a fabricator.
when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited
There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when
it suits you.
not exactly
by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the
DoD and the FBI to that
How does one legally assume?
by doing so
How does one go about doing so?
by doing so
I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago
If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and
report yourself again?
why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly
over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law
If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you
"tlaking" about?
I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats
why does everyting have to be repeated for you
your
ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility?
the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on
my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules
Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of
beat me/spank me/pee on me.
and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider
...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward
establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen
as credible?
they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise
other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in
feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal
sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly
you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on
everyone else
A prude, Mark?
yes a prude.
if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll
consider using it
Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which
approves of your lifestyle?
no
grow up and get over it Dave
I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything.
you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over
anything but it is good advice
I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to
watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his
license revoked.
if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will
One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you.
you and ESP Stevie should remember that
I don't think either of us is likely to forget it.
I do
but more Stevie than yourself
you don't know what I can or will do
About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1)
reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful
more BS Dave
Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to
myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion"
(and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those
words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk
his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says
I am
I don't believe you to be rational,
If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be.
If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you
than If I am
the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent
..
you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on
contact you have with me
I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work
with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you.
ture enough and I can say the same of you of course
cut
Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself?
No
Then hop to it.
to what?
Write letters to the
editor of your paper.
why?
...to tell him that I've been mean to you.
to what end?
cut
you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave
Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a
nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy?
that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you
cut
if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or
be oteherwise punished
That doesn't track, Colonel.
sure does
I'm not Steve
are you certain it is hard to tell some days
. I made a diagnosis.
See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished.
First I'll try to deal with Stevie
he has a license to revoke you don't
further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment,
futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain
criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing
Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable
punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you
therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will
but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once
I cringe to think what that might mean.
you should
Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a
medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG
Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy
posting in an amateur radio newsgroup.
some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG
did get it from Stevie
...only Phil Kane has to be
more careful and since he is an antonry not a paralegal...
I'm sure that it will come as a great surprise to Phil to find that he
is an antonry.
...(Stevie is the
nursing version of a paralegal) he has greater latittude in giving
professional LEGAL oppinions than Stevie has in Giving PROFESSIONAL
nursing opinions
Why have you chosen to write "professional LEGAL" and "PROFESSIONAL
nursing"?
It pleased me to do so
I need NO other reason
cut
BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave
Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore?
right said years ago
I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue
that lie other the years
You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the
person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you*
doing the lying.
you contiue to lie after being told the truth
further you have never had much reason to tell the lie
I have admit to the lie
Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps?
asked and answered yes
Was
that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other
living person, also a lie?
nope it was the result of test done many years ago
...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman
recognized as having the highest tested IQ?
can't addrss you issue without more data
Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars
a lie?
never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid
240K, and I did do that
My mistake.
no it was YOUR lie
prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in
fudge factor
I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the
money badly enough to tkae the risk
you assumed the rest
You didn't say what the "k" was. Perhaps it was 240k dimes.
that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that
or more is not my fault
You just lied Dave
No, I asked you a question.
no you lied in saying I lied about my income I have never stated my
income in RRAP
indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you
don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I
say
With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can
know much of anything you are trying to say.
then you agree
meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't
understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement
beyond a direct in context quote
period
As to the accusations of bigotry on
my part, deal with it.
I will of course
You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so.
where?
Anywhere.
where
are you using some specail definiation of "deal" i should know about
There is no "specail definiation" but I think you should learn the
commonly used definitions.
I am dealing with you now
I am always looking for something more effect but with you so far no
dice
Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone
around must confrom toyour expectations
"Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special
accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly
accepted conduct in my life.
neither have I
I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right
to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself
poking into what is none of your affiar
You're a real non-confromist, Mark.
ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I
don't like but it isn't bad
the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)?
I view your sexual perversity as being immoral.
what sexual perverity?
Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours.
none here no prevesity at all
Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a
little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure?
again what sexual perverity
Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked
about above.
what prevestity?
nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the
heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list
You by my starndard are the prevert
I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on
your "starnard".
nor do I think it has to
you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours
I've seen evidence of your frequent lying.
really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out
there for you if you seek it
There's the story of your life, Mark.
nope perhaps yours from all apearances
I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do.
you certainly do
well documented
indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine
You're a pervert and everyone who
isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a
spellchecke...
and your and stevie whine and whine about it
I complain about it.
you whine about it
Steve has complained about it.
he whines about
Others have
complained about it.
they whine about ti
You tell all, "your probelm".
not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff,
nobdoy is making you.
Is someone making you?
I keep asking and you keep ducking the question
Killfle me that is your previeledge
Thanks for illustrating my point.
no it illustrates MINE
....r and it is the problem of everyone else.
not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff
Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others?
other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint
My target is the lurker population out there
you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my
point to my target
Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense
of your writing ......
yes I have said so many times
....or that they find it laborious to decipher it?
no but you asked the worng question
I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to
read
Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement
"if you don't work it for you don't value it"
therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by
going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No
Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people
that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus
you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the
only viewpoint
Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only
shades of gray.
exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad,
even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is
not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too
many cases where it is a bad thing
You can't learn
morse code .....
true enough
.....and it is someone else's fault.
never claimed that is another lie from you Dave
Didn't you claim that attempting to learn morse was "torture"?
yes I did, and it is for me
but tis is not the same as saying my lack of skill is somebodies elses
fault
so your statement was and remains a lie
Were you
only torturing yourself?
obviously
I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault
It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut
that is another matter
and you duck the point
You tell numerous lies
wrong
Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting!
no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details
and
begin to call numerous others "lier".
I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not
proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have
called on lies
Would you like to adjust the number?
no
cut
That you are (I infer from your action) a person
that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you
assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us
assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave)
is not my fault
Nothing is ever your fault, Mark. Your comments do not read as those of
a person with an IQ of 248.
projecting again Dave
How is it my fault that you have made a bad guess?
you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does
not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on
your incorect deduction it makes you the liar
"you making incrrctly making assumetion"? Your frequent lies make you a
liar, Mark. That's it in a nutshell.
you failure to state the truth about what I have said makes YOU the
liar
that is it in nutshell
You KNOW i am a non comfromist yet you insit that you appply your
confist thinking to my way of life and deduce anything with any
corelation to my views
You've shrouded yourself
in victimhood and you want a free ride in life.
another lie on your part
HF access in amateur radio?
how does this question relate to your claim?
You want a free ride in amateur radio.
no I don't
You want the regs changed to
accommodate you.
wrong again
I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of
the ARS
Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more
than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the
regs should including it appears the people that make em
how that is just about accomodating I frankly don't know
Hf access is needed for life?
I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're
supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different.
for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context
but I don't need HF in my or for my life
I desire it yes I don't need it all
how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for
by law asking for a free ride in life?
You demand that the standards for obtaining HF amateur radio access be
lowered for *you*.
no I don't
I am taking part in the provided for system of seting what the rules
should be for all
as I Bill Sohl Brain, Carl, Len Todd, even you and Stevie ( jim and all
the rest)
Others should have to try to decipher your
writing?
you DON"T have to try to deipher my writing. I have never said you do.
You choose to do so, if you don't like the rsults of your efforts make
another CHOICE nonone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you is
there? certainly not by my order, if you think someone is holding a
gun to head and making you read my stuf call 911, i am certain (a
rarity for me) that in this event and you call someone will help you.
Why are you babbling about calling 911 and someone holding a gun to
someone's head?
you are babbling as if someone is making you read my posts
Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does
not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff
if it is too hard for don't
it is your free choice unless there is gunman there or something like
that
Is the object of your posting here to communicate your
thoughts to others?
other yes
you maybe, maybe not
If it is, you aren't doing a very good job of it.
maybe I am achiveing my goals maybe not that is for ME to judge
One would think that you'd do all in your power to make your posts as
well written and concise as possible.
YOU think so, I disagree
You don't do so.
agreed as is my right
cut
Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address
and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising
organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work.
why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired?
cut
In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out
to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it
may be what happens but we shall see
The result may be that you ending up with your ass in a crack. We shall
see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where
my employer is.
not my problem not my interest and not my goal
Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to
point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them
that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to
be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad.
If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me
there is plenty there in your past on here
but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired
Dave K8MN