| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
November 10th 05, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Are you narcoleptic? no Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely cut I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise. you think that would be newsflash right I think it would be newsflash? No, I think you may be in for a surprise. you thinking would be the newsflash I might be in for a suprise but I can see how Stevie or BoN can claim that who I may have sex with allows Stevie to say I have AIDS Dave heil can think stop the presses Okay, I've thought, "stop the presses". Did it happen? nope becuase you failed to think the LAW say the issues you claim are not important What issues did I claim are not important? you did not I did but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter I expect TN to obey its own laws Oh, I'd expect that it does. as do I But if you don't think that anyone there would be interested in who is submitting a complaint and why, I am sure they will curious, but I expect them to be profesional in the end don't you? I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting we are on the same footing There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here? that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion he is acting in medical capcity as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is is as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act professionaly he is the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it deal with reality Dave if you can Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality. right you don't think but I knew that cut You've lied about your work. Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army? yes cutting unsuported bs You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt Haven't you? no I have not therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said anything? not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when it suits you. not exactly by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so How does one go about doing so? by doing so I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats why does everyting have to be repeated for you your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider ...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen as credible? they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else A prude, Mark? yes a prude. if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll consider using it Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which approves of your lifestyle? no grow up and get over it Dave I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything. you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over anything but it is good advice I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his license revoked. if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that I don't think either of us is likely to forget it. I do but more Stevie than yourself you don't know what I can or will do About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1) reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful more BS Dave Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent .. you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you. ture enough and I can say the same of you of course cut Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Then hop to it. to what? Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? ...to tell him that I've been mean to you. to what end? cut you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy? that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you cut if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished That doesn't track, Colonel. sure does I'm not Steve are you certain it is hard to tell some days . I made a diagnosis. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once I cringe to think what that might mean. you should Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie ...only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry not a paralegal... I'm sure that it will come as a great surprise to Phil to find that he is an antonry. ...(Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) he has greater latittude in giving professional LEGAL oppinions than Stevie has in Giving PROFESSIONAL nursing opinions Why have you chosen to write "professional LEGAL" and "PROFESSIONAL nursing"? It pleased me to do so I need NO other reason cut BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth further you have never had much reason to tell the lie I have admit to the lie Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that My mistake. no it was YOUR lie prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in fudge factor I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the money badly enough to tkae the risk you assumed the rest You didn't say what the "k" was. Perhaps it was 240k dimes. that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave No, I asked you a question. no you lied in saying I lied about my income I have never stated my income in RRAP indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. where are you using some specail definiation of "deal" i should know about There is no "specail definiation" but I think you should learn the commonly used definitions. I am dealing with you now I am always looking for something more effect but with you so far no dice Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar You're a real non-confromist, Mark. ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I don't like but it isn't bad the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)? I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours. none here no prevesity at all Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list You by my starndard are the prevert I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on your "starnard". nor do I think it has to you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it I complain about it. you whine about it Steve has complained about it. he whines about Others have complained about it. they whine about ti You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is someone making you? I keep asking and you keep ducking the question Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint My target is the lurker population out there you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my point to my target Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense of your writing ...... yes I have said so many times ....or that they find it laborious to decipher it? no but you asked the worng question I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to read Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only shades of gray. exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad, even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too many cases where it is a bad thing You can't learn morse code ..... true enough .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave Didn't you claim that attempting to learn morse was "torture"? yes I did, and it is for me but tis is not the same as saying my lack of skill is somebodies elses fault so your statement was and remains a lie Were you only torturing yourself? obviously I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter and you duck the point You tell numerous lies wrong Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting! no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies Would you like to adjust the number? no cut That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault Nothing is ever your fault, Mark. Your comments do not read as those of a person with an IQ of 248. projecting again Dave How is it my fault that you have made a bad guess? you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar "you making incrrctly making assumetion"? Your frequent lies make you a liar, Mark. That's it in a nutshell. you failure to state the truth about what I have said makes YOU the liar that is it in nutshell You KNOW i am a non comfromist yet you insit that you appply your confist thinking to my way of life and deduce anything with any corelation to my views You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part HF access in amateur radio? how does this question relate to your claim? You want a free ride in amateur radio. no I don't You want the regs changed to accommodate you. wrong again I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of the ARS Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the regs should including it appears the people that make em how that is just about accomodating I frankly don't know Hf access is needed for life? I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context but I don't need HF in my or for my life I desire it yes I don't need it all how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for by law asking for a free ride in life? You demand that the standards for obtaining HF amateur radio access be lowered for *you*. no I don't I am taking part in the provided for system of seting what the rules should be for all as I Bill Sohl Brain, Carl, Len Todd, even you and Stevie ( jim and all the rest) Others should have to try to decipher your writing? you DON"T have to try to deipher my writing. I have never said you do. You choose to do so, if you don't like the rsults of your efforts make another CHOICE nonone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you is there? certainly not by my order, if you think someone is holding a gun to head and making you read my stuf call 911, i am certain (a rarity for me) that in this event and you call someone will help you. Why are you babbling about calling 911 and someone holding a gun to someone's head? you are babbling as if someone is making you read my posts Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff if it is too hard for don't it is your free choice unless there is gunman there or something like that Is the object of your posting here to communicate your thoughts to others? other yes you maybe, maybe not If it is, you aren't doing a very good job of it. maybe I am achiveing my goals maybe not that is for ME to judge One would think that you'd do all in your power to make your posts as well written and concise as possible. YOU think so, I disagree You don't do so. agreed as is my right cut Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work. why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired? cut In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see The result may be that you ending up with your ass in a crack. We shall see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where my employer is. not my problem not my interest and not my goal Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad. If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me there is plenty there in your past on here but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| reminding stevie again of his past words | Policy | |||
| when is the Stevie Dictionary coming in print | Policy | |||
| stevie shit | Policy | |||
| IT WILL NEVER END, PEEPEEHOLIC, NEVER! | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
