From: "Bill Sohl" on Thurs 17 Nov 2005 00:55
wrote in message
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Bill Sohl wrote:
Truth is, however, that if there was anything that could have
been described as new, even if it wasn't compelling, odds are we'd
have heard it already via ARRL (QST), Len A., or someone else.
I don't think anyone at ARRL is reading all the comments.
I suspect that Chris Imlay has a hard copy of every comment
filed which he has already reviewed.
If his law firm is any good they WILL have ALL of them for
reference. :-)
Len isn't a reliable source.
Tsk, tsk, tsk...Jimmie is being nasty again. :-)
Despite his claim that he read and understood
all the comments, he didn't know that someone else was reading all the
comments too, and posting the results online for all to see.
Tsk, tsk, tsk...Joe Speroni's website is "official" even though
he is an extremely-biased PRO-CODE advocate?
Even though the URL was on the first page of the comments,
he missed it completely.
To those of us accessing the FCC ECFS as our only immediate
source of information on Docket filings, the Comments are
NOT on "pages" but are filed according to date.
Didn't you forget the "IMHO" in regard to your opinion
of Len's analysis.
Jimmie NEVER forgets, Bill. He is like an effluent. :-)
Jimmie is the "renowned amateur historian" in here, by his own
admission. He is working mightily to be Law Giver. :-)
Jimmie is so highly biased on issues that he defies classes,
beyond Class C, even beyond Class F. :-)
Ho hum...