View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 16th 05, 02:39 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Lucky
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kiwa mods for R75

Hi Les

I also own a Icom R75 but I added some extra filters to it. I added a pair
of 2.8's {FL-96 and FL-103} so they would match up instead of the one more
expensive 3.3 FL-257.

I got the 2.8's for ECSS and for the cheaper price plus I read from people
who bought both the 2.8 and 3.3 told me the 3.3 was just too wide and let
too much carrier noise thru. Also, they said you couldn't really tell that
big of a difference between the 2.8 and the 3.3 for the money.

So, with what I have now, do you think I would really benefit from the added
Kiwa 3.7/3.8 filter? I listen to everything actually. BCB programs, Hams,
and SW broadcasts if I can get them in good.

Do you think I should get the Kiwa filter added? I'm pretty content with
what I have now but who knows what I might be missing out on?

You are well experienced with the R75 and would appreciate your pro opinion
on this matter.

Thank you
Glenn


"Les" wrote in message
oups.com...

Brian wrote:
Just curious if anyone here has had the Kiwa mods for the Icom R75,
particularly the sync and filter upgrades. If so, what was the turnover
time, and which modifications do you feel are the most significant for
dxing?

-Brian


I've owned a stock IC-R75 and one with "ALL" the Kiwa modifications. In
it's stock form, the synchronous detector is non-functional and the agc
on am stinks. If all you do is listen to utilities, it is ok in its
stock form.

But, if you listen to shortwave broadcast stations and or medium wave,
get the kiwa mods. The Kiwa 3.7/3.8 filter is great for dx'ing and the
sync mod works very well. Add a good external speaker such as the Radio
Shack Minimus 7 and you have an excellent receiver. The Icom dc power
supply runs warm and provides way too much voltage too. Might want to
use a "Real" 12 volt dc supply.

YMMV

Les Locklear
Monitoring Since '57
Located On the Gulf of Mexico
Gulfport, MS.
http://www.hammarlund.info/homepage.html

The above e-mail address is a spam trap, no need trying to reply to it.