RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 3rd 06, 01:13 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

On 2 Jan 2006 16:16:24 -0800, wrote:

wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 15:57:47 -0800, wrote:

an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
KØHB wrote:
wrote

Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B, but
100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of
judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all
license classes.

Not the same at all, Jim.

How is it any different? They're both a matter of judgement, not
some absolute scientific or engineering fact or limit.

There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users,
especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues.

Agreed!

But setting the line at 50 W output is purely a matter of judgement. Is
a
50 W transmitter somehow "safe" at the proposed testing level, but not
a 100 W transmitter?

Consider that if the 50 W license were created, a considerable
number of new Class B hams would probably use 100-150 W rigs
and simply not run them at full power.

indeed the exactl elevel of course arbitary

As if you'd know, Markie. You can't even afford third hand equipment
from the bargin bin.

You know what I always am dreaming about little boys

We know, Markie, we know.

you know you are lying and a forgery just like your bussy steve

"what you dreaming about little boy"

was the original

I guess you don't count my new IC 910 H but that doesn't count

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

why do think I can pay my utilly bills? of course as I install more
solar cells and wind units I increasingly don't have a utility bil

what a matter stalker you can't them?

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account