About Us

January 3rd 06, 01:13 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

On 2 Jan 2006 16:16:24 -0800, wrote:

wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 15:57:47 -0800, wrote:

an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
KØHB wrote:
wrote

Deciding that the power level of 50 W is acceptable for Class B, but
100 W is not, is just a matter of judgement. It's the same kind of
judgement as saying that 3500-3525 kHz is not allowed for all
license classes.

Not the same at all, Jim.

How is it any different? They're both a matter of judgement, not
some absolute scientific or engineering fact or limit.

There is a clear safety advantage to lower power for less experienced users,
especially if you don't have a strenuous examination of safety issues.

Agreed!

But setting the line at 50 W output is purely a matter of judgement. Is
a
50 W transmitter somehow "safe" at the proposed testing level, but not
a 100 W transmitter?

Consider that if the 50 W license were created, a considerable
number of new Class B hams would probably use 100-150 W rigs
and simply not run them at full power.

indeed the exactl elevel of course arbitary

As if you'd know, Markie. You can't even afford third hand equipment
from the bargin bin.

You know what I always am dreaming about little boys

We know, Markie, we know.

you know you are lying and a forgery just like your bussy steve

"what you dreaming about little boy"

was the original

I guess you don't count my new IC 910 H but that doesn't count

More Markie lies. You can't afford to pay your utility bills, much less
get a new radio.

why do think I can pay my utilly bills? of course as I install more
solar cells and wind units I increasingly don't have a utility bil

what a matter stalker you can't them?

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access	Lloyd Mitchell	Antenna	43	October 26th 04 01:37 AM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal	Alun	Policy	104	August 26th 04 12:12 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004	private	General	0	May 10th 04 09:39 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL	Louis C. LeVine	Policy	803	January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules	JJ	General	159	August 12th 03 12:25 AM

Menu

About Us