Frank Dresser wrote:
But, why is BPL still around? BPL has shown little but failure in one trial
after another. It hasn't been able to reliably move large volumes of data
economically, at least over the long term. BPL stumbles like some
canvasback bum-of-the-month, yet it's still treated as a serious contender.
Could there really be a hidden adgenda?

One of the reasons BPL is still around is that Google invested $100,000,000
in it. Many Hams and SWLs are boycotting Google because of it.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838
Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/