Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
But, why is BPL still around? BPL has shown little but failure in one trial after another. It hasn't been able to reliably move large volumes of data economically, at least over the long term. BPL stumbles like some canvasback bum-of-the-month, yet it's still treated as a serious contender. Could there really be a hidden adgenda? One of the reasons BPL is still around is that Google invested $100,000,000 in it. Many Hams and SWLs are boycotting Google because of it. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC and True Bilingualism | Shortwave | |||
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio | Policy | |||
OT How close are we to true fascism? How did we get here? | Shortwave | |||
prediction come true | CB |