IBOC Article
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...
"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
You realize if they ever turn on HD at night, DXing will be history.
And the couple of hundred AM DXers left, most of whom are anti-radio and
luddites, will just be SOL.
I'm not aware of any anti-radio luddites, but if I ever meet one, I'll be
sure to remind him to get rid of both his radios and his internet
connection.
As to DXers, I find that most today are very opposed to changes in radio,
whether formatically or technically, and are very negative towards the way
stations operate. I have disassociate myself form DX organisaions as they
almost all seem to be out to change radio to the detriment of those of us
who work in the field.
Since essentially no radio listening, in terms of percentage, is skywave
night listening, the other poings are moot.
However, to an Alex Jones SWL-type distrustful paranoid, Ibiquity's IBOC
looks hidden adgenda-ish. It's not about "CD quality sound" it's about
multicasting.
It is about all of this. It is about giving radio the digital buzzword, more
channels, and improved AM quality.
So, if I've got it wrong, please tell me. Is it impossible for the
IBOC-AM
scheme to be used for multicasting?
Pretty much so. Not enough bandwidth unless analog is dropped and all the
signal is devoted to digital.
|