Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . net... wrote in message oups.com... You realize if they ever turn on HD at night, DXing will be history. And the couple of hundred AM DXers left, most of whom are anti-radio and luddites, will just be SOL. I'm not aware of any anti-radio luddites, but if I ever meet one, I'll be sure to remind him to get rid of both his radios and his internet connection. As to DXers, I find that most today are very opposed to changes in radio, whether formatically or technically, and are very negative towards the way stations operate. I have disassociate myself form DX organisaions as they almost all seem to be out to change radio to the detriment of those of us who work in the field. Since essentially no radio listening, in terms of percentage, is skywave night listening, the other poings are moot. However, to an Alex Jones SWL-type distrustful paranoid, Ibiquity's IBOC looks hidden adgenda-ish. It's not about "CD quality sound" it's about multicasting. It is about all of this. It is about giving radio the digital buzzword, more channels, and improved AM quality. So, if I've got it wrong, please tell me. Is it impossible for the IBOC-AM scheme to be used for multicasting? Pretty much so. Not enough bandwidth unless analog is dropped and all the signal is devoted to digital. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Why I Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |