View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 06, 02:28 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default QUESTION - Does a "Non-Resonant" Dipole Antenna work better {Benefit} when a Receiver is RF Grounded in the Shack ? ? ?

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:37:43 GMT, David wrote:

On 23 Apr 2006 00:38:18 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

For One and All,

Per "Telamon" - A Hertzian Antenna such as a Dipole has two elements
that develop the Voltage across the Receiver Input
- - - So an RF Ground becomes superfluous.

This Statement may be True a the specific Frequency that
the Dipole is Designed to Operate at {Resonance} .

"IS" this Statement always True at other Frequencies that
the Dipole was NOT Designed to Operate at {Non-Resonant} ?

QUESTION - Does a "Non-Resonant" Dipole Antenna work better
{Benefit} when a Receiver is RF Grounded in the Shack ? ? ?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw...a/message/9189

i want to know - cause iane ~ RHF
.
Shortwave Listener Antennas = http://tinyurl.com/ogvcf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
SWL Antenna Group = http://tinyurl.com/ogvcf
.

I suggest you find a nice copy of the ARRL Antenna book and put it in
your ****ter for a few months.


Yes, please... see:

http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?categor... gation&words=

bob
k5qwg