DX-160
Lisa Simpson wrote:
ok, get off the "more sensitive" thing already everybody. I never said I
thought it would be more sensitive, I simply noted that it is not. The
sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning, it sucks!
Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I *do* have other
receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no need to fart with one
that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone interested in buying a
DX-160?
I guess like several others on this thread I'm now a bit confused.
There should have been no surprise that the radio had bandspread tuning
after all the prior threads and what I assume were adequate pictures
from the seller. Nor should there have been much question about how it
works.
If You
" *do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, and see
no need to fart with one that does."
then why in the world did you make such a big deal about buying it only
to turn around and complain loudly about it's single most prominent
feature.
|