LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old May 18th 06, 04:26 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
John S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default DX-160


Lisa Simpson wrote:
ok, get off the "more sensitive" thing already everybody. I never said I
thought it would be more sensitive, I simply noted that it is not. The
sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning, it sucks!
Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I *do* have other
receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no need to fart with one
that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone interested in buying a
DX-160?


I guess like several others on this thread I'm now a bit confused.
There should have been no surprise that the radio had bandspread tuning
after all the prior threads and what I assume were adequate pictures
from the seller. Nor should there have been much question about how it
works.

If You
" *do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, and see
no need to fart with one that does."
then why in the world did you make such a big deal about buying it only
to turn around and complain loudly about it's single most prominent
feature.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017