Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lisa Simpson wrote: ok, get off the "more sensitive" thing already everybody. I never said I thought it would be more sensitive, I simply noted that it is not. The sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning, it sucks! Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I *do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no need to fart with one that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone interested in buying a DX-160? I guess like several others on this thread I'm now a bit confused. There should have been no surprise that the radio had bandspread tuning after all the prior threads and what I assume were adequate pictures from the seller. Nor should there have been much question about how it works. If You " *do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, and see no need to fart with one that does." then why in the world did you make such a big deal about buying it only to turn around and complain loudly about it's single most prominent feature. |