Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am
[Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?]
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm
wrote:
From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am
wrote:
From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm
BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER.
Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank
Gilliland has made it available.
So? Who are *you* to demand proof?
A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be.
MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really?
Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated
claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated
claims OUGHT to demand proof.
I never saw myself as
superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform.
It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that
he'll never be an amateur.
I never knew that Len was a professional radio. I'll make a note of it.
Op is the operative word. Why would anyone as smug as you make a note
of anything?
Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a
veteran.
I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand
proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the
artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it.
Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of
participating in seven (7) hostile actions?
I'd say that a good time would be right after Len bares his soul and
admits that he engaged in being an imposter in regard to what it is like
to go through an artillery barrage. I'm guessing that won't happen.
Why after?
When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in
military service it becomes very serious indeed.
Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to
put your life on the line.
Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion?
I'd say it would.
If it actually happened.
One
helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio
hobby with imagined self-glory.
...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line,
Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and
stepping up on that soapbox.
No bunting.
I see bunting. Len is wrapped in it.
By serving (in the military), you are in the que for
whatever comes up.
I didn't like queues when I was in the military. I sure don't have to
queue for anything now.
We're aware of your dislike for military service, and you're certainly
not in the que any longer. My inactive service committment ends this
year.
Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one
such person.
That's a pretty bold supposition on your part. What indicates that
someone "wasn't up to it"?
You'll have to ask Jim what the problem was. He hasn't been
forthcoming with that information.
Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went
into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery
barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event?
Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in
seven (7) hostile actions.
I've seen no detailed description on Steve's part. Len's description
was quite detailed, right down to sphincter.
Everyone's got one. They all stink.
Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of
imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder.
It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree?
Would I?
Dave K8MN
No, maybe you wouldn't. Len says something and he's a liar. Robesin
says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. It's not
hard to figure you out.