| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
October 21st 06, 04:34 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am [Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?] wrote: From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm wrote: From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER. Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank Gilliland has made it available. So? Who are *you* to demand proof? A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be. MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really? Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated claims OUGHT to demand proof. I never saw myself as superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform. It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that he'll never be an amateur. I never knew that Len was a professional radio. I'll make a note of it. Op is the operative word. Why would anyone as smug as you make a note of anything? Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a veteran. I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it. Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of participating in seven (7) hostile actions? I'd say that a good time would be right after Len bares his soul and admits that he engaged in being an imposter in regard to what it is like to go through an artillery barrage. I'm guessing that won't happen. Why after? When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in military service it becomes very serious indeed. Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to put your life on the line. Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion? I'd say it would. If it actually happened. One helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio hobby with imagined self-glory. ...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line, Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and stepping up on that soapbox. No bunting. I see bunting. Len is wrapped in it. By serving (in the military), you are in the que for whatever comes up. I didn't like queues when I was in the military. I sure don't have to queue for anything now. We're aware of your dislike for military service, and you're certainly not in the que any longer. My inactive service committment ends this year. Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one such person. That's a pretty bold supposition on your part. What indicates that someone "wasn't up to it"? You'll have to ask Jim what the problem was. He hasn't been forthcoming with that information. Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event? Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in seven (7) hostile actions. I've seen no detailed description on Steve's part. Len's description was quite detailed, right down to sphincter. Everyone's got one. They all stink. Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder. It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree? Would I? Dave K8MN No, maybe you wouldn't. Len says something and he's a liar. Robesin says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. It's not hard to figure you out. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Direct Question for Brian P Burke, N0IMD. | Policy | |||
| Embarrassing Moments Caught on Tape | Scanner | |||
Threaded Mode
