RadioBanter - View Single Post

[email protected]

wrote:
On 24 Nov 2006 23:26:42 -0800, "an_old_friend"
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:24:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

Bret Ludwig wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.
if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much

How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.

If an FM rig is all one has for 2m, it is easy to believe that there is
little CW activity on that band.

it is also easy to believe with multimode rig too dave

Dave K8MN
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
the constition amend 10 restricts anything note covered by the document
to states or to the people

the supremacy cluase makes the constituion and the traties the supreme
law of the land

therfore anything not coevered by the constituion or by treaty is Mine

therefore as matter of law the burden is on the resrictin to prove it
is needed till 2003 code testing had that ..now it does not have that
most persons agreed ONLY the treaty langauge kept the testing in place

why drop it becuase it can not justified as a matter of law
interesting that the forger chooses to forge this post a copy of one I
made elsewhere

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

mopy wants your fudge