On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 27, 11:02?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:57:28 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
Doesn't he have a cool cookbook, and Steven Segal videos?

I could use that as a fire starter I guess


more proof of the crimial nature of your actions against Dloyd that
you provided futher blood in the water

this BTW Dloyd the reason it ****es me off so I am tried of the
stlaker like Mike I am replying to continuing to harras e with such
inane postings

Then stop responding to every single post, that is your option, but
you contine to feed the frenzy (pouring blood into the water).


I am also tired, but I have no solution to the issue that you would
agree upon.

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group


I can only control myself and my actions......

never said otherwise Dloyd

I never said you did

but when you take action that have reasonably forseeable consequences you share inthe respoiniblity for the actions of those 3rd parties

First I have seen no proof of consequenses that you said occured, I
therefore share in nothing but my own actions. You set out to obtain
the attention of everyone on the group with your reign of harrassment.
You made a point that you have so many friends, and I legally obtained
information that appears to discredit you.

when you posted about my wife and certain book you knew or should have known that the filth mongers would run with it

What is the problem, this information was available on a public
accessible profile. If you or a member of your family are "in the
closet" certainly they should have had better sense than to make that
information widely available to the public. There wasn't any
breaking in or "hacking" into anything. Your mad at me because your
family member didn't have enough sense to keep her private information
private and I discovered this information. You implied we were at war
quoting from the "Art of War", and call me your foe, did you expect me
to restrain my posting. You don't restrain your posting. You attacked
Steve and tried to use the death of his daughter as nail to drive
through his heart to get at Steve, I used your wife to get at you "tit
for tat". You made light of the death of a child, and said she should
have been aborted and somehow he was responsible for her death, how
anymore dispicable can you get, to attack the fact that someone has
lost a child. You wife's sexuality pales in comparison. I have always
said I would keep it on the net which I did, I never called you or
sent you emails, prove otherwise, all information was obtained on the
internet. I would be more upset at the people who call my wife a
shemale without any proof. Nevertheless, I haven't seen a great
number of posts harping on this one subject, but now that you have let
it know that it bothers you, I am sure there will be an increase.
Again your giving out too much information

you should have known posting that list would result all kinds of off
topic and disruptive to this NG post by the filth mongers

you undertook those action with I believe to be mailce toward a poin t
I believe you effected admited to when you you admited you "lashed
out" you sought to harm in fit a pique at best or deliberate and
preditated calualtion at worst

No, it was only posted to refute your claims, how damaging can a
wedding registry list be to someone, its not like you asked for a
bunch of weird stuff. Nevertheless, this group has been disrupted for
many years.


the damge you have done me is beyond your power to retreive you are
therefore at best a losse cannon proune to do me harm without any
cause therefore I will attack you and contiue to seek to obscure you
threads and post til i can assured you will not be in apostion to do
me further harm if you decide (or fail to control yourself) and "lash
out at me and my wife and good knows what ever memebr of y family or
friends you vent your lashing on

Again you are harping on one term as if it has great meaning, besides
the word lash I could have used the word response, to me there are
interchangable. I believe that no damage has been done, and without
proof, I cannot believe you because of your pattern of lying.

If you pout blood in shark infested water with swimers in the water
some folks would called that Homocide of anyone that then dies in the
next few minutes from sharck attack

Well if the news groups postings kill your, I would really be
interested of how words jumped of of the monitor and did you damage.
What was your wife up all night crying that it got out? She should
have protected herself, that was her responsibility. I think more
than likely she probably chewed your ass for even engaging in this
behavior and that is why you are so ****ed. Maybe you need a new
outlet.

...... and once again
for a third time attempt to post in this NG with engaging with you
into this type of behavior.

which is not ilegal or imoral

It is in my opinion, a legitamate effort at self defense

it is a techneque I have more effective than any other at my disposal

I have told what will happen in various senarios and left the choice
of how to proceed

I sumerize them agin You can abandon the Dloyd Nick and thus go beyond my abilty to track your posting for a cintiuation of this treatment,
which you claim to object to(that I point of fact believe you are
geting exactly the response you want is yet matter)

or you can continue to post as "Dloyd" and be subject to what you
claim to see as harrassment and I see as proactive self defense aginst
a person I preceive to my foe

you have no legal rght under the guise of claiming to demand I cease
to protect myself aginst attack by yourself and others

My legal counsel says otherwise, but again he said if you have very
little assest, its like beating a dead horse, why bother. But then
again it is done, once again I tried to reason with you, be cordial,
but your are an unreasonable/unstable person, I will continue to post
under this nick because the first admendment gives me that right. That
arguement has already been weighed by the US Supreme Court. You want
to continue the behavior and your reign of harrassment, that is your
option. As I have said before, I will not succumb to your demands of
blackmail by threats, "do as I say or I will continue my attack", I
have attempted to be reasonable but your behavior is blackmail, and so
be it. Again you have lied I took you at your word which was
disengage and for me to remove the blogs, and you would disengage,
both of which I have complied, although not altogether just because
you said . But like a blackmailer, you keep changing the terms asking
for more and more, until you are satisfied, which appear to be never,
next you will be asking for a cash payment, but I don't think you
would be that stupid. So I will continue to post under my name that I
have used for many years and you will continue to be like the little
boy who cried wolf, and eventially what you post about me will be
totally ignored and irrelvent, but useful for my purpose. So flame
away!