View Single Post
  #174   Report Post  
Old March 29th 07, 01:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Keith Dysart Keith Dysart is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

On Mar 28, 11:40 pm, Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:


And just for greater certainty, I forgot to mention that the
reflection coefficient from the line to the generator is 0 in
my experiment (generator impedance is equal to the line
characteristic impedance) so using the reflection coefficient,
there are no reflections.


Because it is an active source, not a passive resistor,
your reflection coefficient is wrong.


He will completely ignore this and keep insisting on his truth. Me
thinks he is trolling......


Good day Dan,

I offer you the same challenge as Cecil, find the error in my
analysis and then compute the correct amount of re-reflection.

And provide the expression for computing RC in the presence of
sources if it is different than the conventional
RC=(Z2-Z1)/(Z2+Z1).

When you find nothing wrong with the analysis, ask yourself why
you don't believe the results?

....Keith