On 9 May, 20:23, Cecil Moore wrote:
art wrote:
I noted that you said both had
electric and magnetic properties but I could not rationaly deduce that
they were the same.

Balanis has a pretty good treatment of the
subject but I don't have that book with me.

You also stated that the electrons were corona discharges
which is new to me.

Instead of becoming energetic enough to leave the
conductor, electrons normally shed their excess
energy in the form of photons.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil,
I think that we are all in agreement now on the legitimacy of adding a
time
metric to Gauss's equation unless it was a quirk of luck that two
programs came to agreement. We also know that for a dc current flow we
cannot produce a radiating field because we must have two vectors
created by a time varying field. In other words the particles must be
different in some way
as like particals cannot collide or combine to form a radiative field.
I believe we also know that any combination of particals must occur
after release from the gravitational field and where I could go along
with your corona description
and the interface impedance of 377 ohms. From this analysis the
particles could well have the same properties as you state but of
different polarities which prevents initial collisions or a joining
mechanism. If this conforms with
known basic physics then one should see the importance of the ratio of
emitted particles. If this does not conform to known basic figures I
would like to know why .Then my thinking becomes in conformance with
the elite in this group such that sniping and derision can come to an
end. Gauss gave me the overall picture of the formation of radiation
as a completed jigsaw puzzle picture but I am looking for knoweledge
of the individual connecting parts for a more detailed analysis which
is accepted by those familiar with basic physics
to bring myself inline with those knoweledgable in the arts. All I
need is some answers to my question that evokes agreement from all and
the thread gets closure. If it is basic physics it should not be that
hard for the experts to explain. Cecil you are familiar with the many
aspects of radiation thus you have a great opportunity to supply the
required info that cannot be refuted by others .,So sieze the
opportunity where others are shying away.
Best regards
Art
Art