Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 9 May, 20:23, Cecil Moore wrote:
art wrote: I noted that you said both had electric and magnetic properties but I could not rationaly deduce that they were the same. Balanis has a pretty good treatment of the subject but I don't have that book with me. You also stated that the electrons were corona discharges which is new to me. Instead of becoming energetic enough to leave the conductor, electrons normally shed their excess energy in the form of photons. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil, I think that we are all in agreement now on the legitimacy of adding a time metric to Gauss's equation unless it was a quirk of luck that two programs came to agreement. We also know that for a dc current flow we cannot produce a radiating field because we must have two vectors created by a time varying field. In other words the particles must be different in some way as like particals cannot collide or combine to form a radiative field. I believe we also know that any combination of particals must occur after release from the gravitational field and where I could go along with your corona description and the interface impedance of 377 ohms. From this analysis the particles could well have the same properties as you state but of different polarities which prevents initial collisions or a joining mechanism. If this conforms with known basic physics then one should see the importance of the ratio of emitted particles. If this does not conform to known basic figures I would like to know why .Then my thinking becomes in conformance with the elite in this group such that sniping and derision can come to an end. Gauss gave me the overall picture of the formation of radiation as a completed jigsaw puzzle picture but I am looking for knoweledge of the individual connecting parts for a more detailed analysis which is accepted by those familiar with basic physics to bring myself inline with those knoweledgable in the arts. All I need is some answers to my question that evokes agreement from all and the thread gets closure. If it is basic physics it should not be that hard for the experts to explain. Cecil you are familiar with the many aspects of radiation thus you have a great opportunity to supply the required info that cannot be refuted by others .,So sieze the opportunity where others are shying away. Best regards Art Art |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
art wrote:
Cecil you are familiar with the many aspects of radiation thus you have a great opportunity to supply the required info that cannot be refuted by others .,So sieze the opportunity where others are shying away. Art, I am moving myself to a new QTH and just don't have the time. To the best of my present knowledge, all of the coherent photons are identical. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: @$10NOS LEWIS & KAUFMAN, Ltd. LOS GATOS 254 ELECTRON TUBERARE | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: Tube, electron = 6DR7 | Swap | |||
FA: EIMAC 3-500Z ELECTRON TUBE AND HR-6 PLATE CAP | Swap | |||
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
inducors/form factors/radiation revisited | Antenna |