"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 14:46:38 -0700, K7ITM wrote:
(snip)
A number of years ago in this group our departed friend, Reg, made a
comment more or less saying that the fewer (non-ideal) reactances were
in the matching network, the lower the losses were.
I offered an example that proved this wrong. I'm extremely strapped
for time but I think the thread has something to do with L-networks if
anyone cares to search for it.
Wes
http://tinyurl.com/2vn4sa