Guy from university physics dept. makes claims to incite/provokeamateurs!
John Smith I wrote:
Buck wrote:
...
the spammers will love this, but he will regret your posting his url
openly.
Naaa ...
He works at a university, trust me, if he can't stop the spam from being
in his mailbox, a co-worker/student can!
Ever try gmail? That one simple tool allows me to freely give out my
email ... if the spammers get though it, I will evoke other counter
measures ... spam is only a problem for the computer illiterate ...
Who ever head of posting url's in a newsgroup? (joke)
That page appears to be the original one that came out in 2004. It's
missing one part though. In the original release, there was a mention of
how efficient the antenna was, proof cited was how when he turned the
power up to 100 watts, the antenna melted. That part is gone. I googled
up the thread to see if my memory was bad, but it wasn't. The release
must have been revised.
So has there been a breakthrough in how the antenna maintains a
constant current through it? Can we assume the voltage must be constant
also?
- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -
|