John Smith I wrote:
Buck wrote:

...
the spammers will love this, but he will regret your posting his url
openly.

Naaa ...

He works at a university, trust me, if he can't stop the spam from being
in his mailbox, a co-worker/student can!

Ever try gmail? That one simple tool allows me to freely give out my
email ... if the spammers get though it, I will evoke other counter
measures ... spam is only a problem for the computer illiterate ...


Who ever head of posting url's in a newsgroup? (joke)


That page appears to be the original one that came out in 2004. It's
missing one part though. In the original release, there was a mention of
how efficient the antenna was, proof cited was how when he turned the
power up to 100 watts, the antenna melted. That part is gone. I googled
up the thread to see if my memory was bad, but it wasn't. The release
must have been revised.

So has there been a breakthrough in how the antenna maintains a
constant current through it? Can we assume the voltage must be constant
also?



- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -