Moderated newsgroup daily activity
On Sep 29, 4:15 pm, an_old_friend wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:11 pm, wrote:
On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, an_old_friend wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:53 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Leo" wrote:
That's just weird.
It is silly, really. Anyone with any net.knowledge can have an unlimited
number of names, IP addresses, etc. There's really no way to "ban" someone.
I could still be posting there today, if I really wanted to.
insteresting observartion MD you are right of course
OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem
Ayup! And the others, too. They couldn't stand it when I decided to
quit getting all the spam in my regualr email box.
indeed I use much the same theory alough what migth realy fix the
problem kis robomoderations reqiure somesort of auntentacation of the
sender nothing more that would stop all the problem children but
robeson
Robesin thought that even though I said the same things in the same
way and in the same language that I was somehow trying to "trick" him
with my new throwaway email addy. What a moron.
Welp, I just checked hot-ham's email box and there are hundreds of:
"PAYPAL" phishing expeditions, I just won the Australian Lottery, the
British Lottery, Russian girls that want to meet me, Viagara, Longer
weenie medicine, and untold spam that I have no interest in seeing.
Hmmmm? I wonder if Larry tRolls old Russian girlfriend is trying to
reach me? Or did he marry her? Maybe he married her and she's still
trying to reach me?
Then we had BlackTower and Quitefine, posing as Mike and Jim. Good
Grief!!!
but Procoder have specail prevledges
and as MD said the "ban in Mod is easy to get around.
They have no need for a "work-around." They are probably posting
sticky sweet garbage that passes through with flying colors.
|