View Single Post
  #25   Report Post  
Old March 5th 08, 10:49 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Gene Fuller Gene Fuller is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 342
Default The Rest of the Story

Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
Hecht seems to have sufficient reputation that I trust that he made
this statement in the context of optics and not in the context of
electrical circuits.


EM waves are EM waves, Keith, no matter what the frequency.
EM waves all obey the laws of reflection physics, superposition,
and conservation of energy principle. If you want to prove those
laws to be invalid and replace them with ones of your own design,
be our guest.


Cecil,

It is likely that all of these interference-related items you like to
quote from Hecht are cast in an environment of lossless optical
components. The characteristic impedance is set by the index of
refraction of the various layers, but none of the optical layers have
any absorption.

Soooo, how does any of this optical stuff extend to making arguments
about the absorption or re-reflection of energy in the source resistor
for the HF case?

The laws of physics may be inviolate, but it is not quite so clear that
your derived and extended models share the same characteristic.

73,
Gene
W4SZ