View Single Post
  #36   Report Post  
Old March 6th 08, 11:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Fry Richard Fry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 440
Default 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA

"Derek" wrote:
You still don't understand! you are talking bull**** you have no
idea of the design of Art's antenna or of how it works or it's needs
yet you put up your remedies for old style antenna's.

I am sure Denny is a competent and independant operator and will be
aware of all the pitfall's of testing a new antenna and does not need
you to tell him how to go about it.

As Art said in a previous post Denny is free to do as he wishes Art
will have no input in the testing of the antenna, and nor should you

____________

Objectively, Derek, for what reasons are you are so willing to believe the
claims that art makes for his "highly-efficient," shoe-box MW antenna, and
for your confidence in Denny's ability to measure its radiation
characteristics scientifically?

No BS, please. Facts count -- emotion does not.

RF