Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 6th 08, 11:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 440
Default 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA

"Derek" wrote:
You still don't understand! you are talking bull**** you have no
idea of the design of Art's antenna or of how it works or it's needs
yet you put up your remedies for old style antenna's.

I am sure Denny is a competent and independant operator and will be
aware of all the pitfall's of testing a new antenna and does not need
you to tell him how to go about it.

As Art said in a previous post Denny is free to do as he wishes Art
will have no input in the testing of the antenna, and nor should you

____________

Objectively, Derek, for what reasons are you are so willing to believe the
claims that art makes for his "highly-efficient," shoe-box MW antenna, and
for your confidence in Denny's ability to measure its radiation
characteristics scientifically?

No BS, please. Facts count -- emotion does not.

RF


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
constrained listening criteria: tom k in L.A. Shortwave 1 January 17th 07 01:49 PM
A Small Indoor FM Antenna W. Watson Antenna 4 March 27th 06 06:02 PM
Good Small Antenna David CB 5 December 29th 03 03:09 PM
Common Criteria Bill Shell Swap 0 December 28th 03 07:49 PM
Small Directional Antenna Ron Antenna 5 September 4th 03 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017