Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Derek" wrote:
You still don't understand! you are talking bull**** you have no idea of the design of Art's antenna or of how it works or it's needs yet you put up your remedies for old style antenna's. I am sure Denny is a competent and independant operator and will be aware of all the pitfall's of testing a new antenna and does not need you to tell him how to go about it. As Art said in a previous post Denny is free to do as he wishes Art will have no input in the testing of the antenna, and nor should you ____________ Objectively, Derek, for what reasons are you are so willing to believe the claims that art makes for his "highly-efficient," shoe-box MW antenna, and for your confidence in Denny's ability to measure its radiation characteristics scientifically? No BS, please. Facts count -- emotion does not. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
constrained listening criteria: | Shortwave | |||
A Small Indoor FM Antenna | Antenna | |||
Good Small Antenna | CB | |||
Common Criteria | Swap | |||
Small Directional Antenna | Antenna |