View Single Post
  #59   Report Post  
Old March 7th 08, 02:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Keith Dysart[_2_] Keith Dysart[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 492
Default The Rest of the Story

On Mar 7, 8:30*am, Roger Sparks wrote:
Hi Keith,

I must still not be "getting" something because while I now follow your numbers and trig identity, it looks to me like you used Cecil's premise "PRs = 50w + Pref * " to show that '50 W plus Pref' = 68 + 68cos(2wt-61.9degrees) watts, which would be correct for the 12.5 ohm case.

So, rather than disproving Cecil's premise, you successfully demonstrated that it was correct in the instantaneous case.

What am I missing?


The actual dissipation in the source resistor was computed using
circuit theory
to derive the voltage and current through the resistor and then
multiplying them
together to get the power dissipation:
Vrs(t) = 82.46 cos(wt -30.96 degrees)
Irs(t) = 1.649 cos(wt -30.96 degrees)
Prs.circuit(t) = Vrs(t) * Irs(t)
= 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees)

This was then shown not to be equal to the results using Cecil's
hypothesis
because
Prs.before(t) = 50 + 50 cos(2wt)
Pref(t) = 18 - 18 cos(2wt)
which would give, using Cecil's hypothesis
Prs.cecil(t) = 68 + 32 cos(2wt)

So I accept the circuit theory result of
Prs.circuit(t) = 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees)
and conclude that, since the results using Cecil's hypothesis are
different, Cecil's hypothesis must be incorrect.

That is, the power dissipated in the source resistor after the
reflection
returns is not the sum of the power dissipated in the resistor before
the
reflection returns plus the power in the reflected wave.

Now it does turn out that the average power dissipated in the source
resistor is the sum of the average power before the reflection returns
plus the average power in the reflected wave since
Prs.circuit.average = average( 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees) )
= 68
This does agree with Cecil's analysis using average powers. But energy
flows must balance on a moment by moment basis if energy is to be
conserved so when we do the instantaneous analysis we find that
Cecil's
hypothesis does not hold.

...Keith

PS: To compute Vrs(t) and Irs(t) using circuit theory:
The generator output voltage
Vg(t) = Vf.g(t) + Vr.g(t)
where Vf.g(t) is the line forward voltage at the generator
and Vr.g(t) is the line reflected voltage at the generator.

The generator output current
Ig(t) = If.g(t) + Ir.g(t)
where If.g(t) is the line forward current at the generator
and Ir.g(t) is the line reflected current at the generator.

Where Vs(t) is the source voltage
Vrs(t) = Vs(t) - Vg(t)
Irs(t) = Ig(t)
and the power is
Prs.circuit(t) = Vrs(t) * Irs(t)