Thread: If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?
View Single Post
  #37   Report Post  
Old April 22nd 09, 01:43 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Phil Allison Phil Allison is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 18
Default If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?

"Tim Shoppa the ****** "
Greegor the Geek
What specifically are your complaints with this Wiki ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver

A 180 Kbyte article about a technology developed in the 1910's,

** Irrelevant when it was first developed - cos it is still current tech.

The article is not pretending to be being a history lesson.


A smaller point, is that the language sounds a lot like it was written
in a language other than English and then translated.


** That is an utterly absurd idea.

Smacks of paranoid schizophrenia.

Shoppa has completely lost it.



...... Phil


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote