LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27   Report Post  
Old April 22nd 09, 01:43 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 18
Default If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?


"Tim Shoppa the ****** "
Greegor the Geek
What specifically are your complaints with this Wiki ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver


A 180 Kbyte article about a technology developed in the 1910's,

** Irrelevant when it was first developed - cos it is still current tech.

The article is not pretending to be being a history lesson.


A smaller point, is that the language sounds a lot like it was written
in a language other than English and then translated.


** That is an utterly absurd idea.

Smacks of paranoid schizophrenia.

Shoppa has completely lost it.



...... Phil


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 14 March 13th 04 08:33 AM
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 0 March 11th 04 10:01 PM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 22nd 03 05:18 AM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 0 July 21st 03 11:12 PM
Superheterodyne AM to SW conversion info Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 13th 03 06:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017