Thread: Standing waves
View Single Post
  #49   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 09, 04:34 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Standing waves

Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:23 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
Have you now discovered a new particle which has charge and no mass?
There you go again, all particles have mass and Newtons laws are still
in place
Stop playing the fool

So explain how your particle which has mass can attain light speed.

tom
K0TAR


You could go to college and learn all this but here goes.
Planck did a treatise on heat radiation where he stated that heat
radiation
is enabled by two independent functions. First was by conduction and
the second by a ray.
He went on to enlarge on the notion of a ray when is studies moved on
to radio and light radiation. He often consulted with Einstein and was
well aware of his efforts to find the weak force and where he gave up
on that and started a new science where he came up with mc sqd,. With
the abandoned search of Einstein Planck settled hard on the idea that
light was a radiated beam or wave of sorts and it was natural of him
to see radiation of heat in a similar manner i.e a wave or ray in a
similar way that light was thought of.
In fact his work moved later to the nature of light and radio
radiation where the theme of a ray or wave was retained. If Einstein
had included the wrappings of the Big Bang in his studies particles
would have retained the high ground for both him and Planck.
as well as this group together with science which has been misled to
this very day.
Thus Planck started on the wrong track with respect to heat radiation
and all of his other studies. Now he may have known what the speed of
light was but he would see it as a ray of light the same way as a ray


Bafflegab.

of heat. It was later found independently that a particle at the exit
from the combined field intersection was the speed of light which now
can be seen as the cause of light in connection with particle speed
i.e an effect and not a cause.


Give references. This is the key to your argument, in case you can't
figure that out. It also breaks all current laws of physics.

Since we note that wavelengths can denote a change of color the
connection of wavelength, spin ,deccelleration or what ever, directly
relates to the emmission of light.
So to answer your question the cause of this particular speed is the
interaction of two intesecting fields on a particle of mass. This same
particle is the same particle that emits light which cannot exceed the
speed attained in the combined fields since there is no
applied accellerating force applied to that same particle ,only
retardation. And this is the same particle that sits on a diamagnetic
material that is removed from a heated anode without spin but with an
increase in potential energy. Without spin this same particle
deccellerates before impacting on a luminescent glass surface of a CRT.


So you admit you can't explain how to get a particle with mass to light
speed.

Fraud.

tom
K0TAR