Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:23 pm, tom wrote: Art Unwin wrote: Have you now discovered a new particle which has charge and no mass? There you go again, all particles have mass and Newtons laws are still in place Stop playing the fool So explain how your particle which has mass can attain light speed. tom K0TAR You could go to college and learn all this but here goes. Planck did a treatise on heat radiation where he stated that heat radiation is enabled by two independent functions. First was by conduction and the second by a ray. He went on to enlarge on the notion of a ray when is studies moved on to radio and light radiation. He often consulted with Einstein and was well aware of his efforts to find the weak force and where he gave up on that and started a new science where he came up with mc sqd,. With the abandoned search of Einstein Planck settled hard on the idea that light was a radiated beam or wave of sorts and it was natural of him to see radiation of heat in a similar manner i.e a wave or ray in a similar way that light was thought of. In fact his work moved later to the nature of light and radio radiation where the theme of a ray or wave was retained. If Einstein had included the wrappings of the Big Bang in his studies particles would have retained the high ground for both him and Planck. as well as this group together with science which has been misled to this very day. Thus Planck started on the wrong track with respect to heat radiation and all of his other studies. Now he may have known what the speed of light was but he would see it as a ray of light the same way as a ray Bafflegab. of heat. It was later found independently that a particle at the exit from the combined field intersection was the speed of light which now can be seen as the cause of light in connection with particle speed i.e an effect and not a cause. Give references. This is the key to your argument, in case you can't figure that out. It also breaks all current laws of physics. Since we note that wavelengths can denote a change of color the connection of wavelength, spin ,deccelleration or what ever, directly relates to the emmission of light. So to answer your question the cause of this particular speed is the interaction of two intesecting fields on a particle of mass. This same particle is the same particle that emits light which cannot exceed the speed attained in the combined fields since there is no applied accellerating force applied to that same particle ,only retardation. And this is the same particle that sits on a diamagnetic material that is removed from a heated anode without spin but with an increase in potential energy. Without spin this same particle deccellerates before impacting on a luminescent glass surface of a CRT. So you admit you can't explain how to get a particle with mass to light speed. Fraud. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |