On Dec 6, 1:10*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 some gomer wrote:

No where does Maxwell's equations suggests a particular shape or
elevation or even straght when describing a radiator

Hmmmm,

Did Maxwell design antennas? *Did he describe them? *If he had no
particular shape in mind, did that mean it was a mesh like a fish net
cast over the rocks? *Did he try working the international space
station with this limp radiator powered by the feeble force?

WWMD?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Maxwell dealt only with the mathematics of the time where many people
had arrived at equations with respect to scientific observations.
Many of these equations from different countries were actually
duplicates so he was able to side line some. reduce some and even
combined some such that he has a set of equations. Ofcourse he was
aware that with observations within the Universe one must obey the
requirement of equilibrium. You can do this by placing all metrics on
one side of the equal or equal ibrium side and zero ion the other
side.
One of his final equations did not, in fact, equal zero and in fact
the metric of time was missing among other things. Now he couldn't go
back to Gauss or anybody for an explanation. If he had spoken to Gauss
he may have told him that if he made a static field dynamic he could
correct the initial equations provided as the product was one and the
same! Instead Maxwell concerned himself only with the metrics of the
equations and not the scale. So he cancelled the metrics that were
available and then added some metrics so he could cancel what was
remaining which implied equil ibrium noy knowing what the additions
added signified. At that time he could not have cared less as he
primarily a mathematician.
When Yagi and Uda came along they stumbled on intercoupling of planar
forms with out any regard to Maxwells equations. For them, the use of
half wave length was of no concern as it provided answers that
were within 10% of real life. That aproach lasted to this very day
when I came along and pointed out that by using the Gaussian law of
statics
they could then account for the remaining 10% of radiation by
accounting for other forces which could provide for 100% efficiency.
When this observation was shared on the internet it met with disdain
by those who in the absence of knoweledge followed the trend of the
written books of science known for their plagarisms. After all, those
who followed the books to the letter were resting on the mantle of
perceived experts where all agreed on the same thing. Rather than
learning new things about physics they decided to agree to bestow on
the teacher the myth that he was wearing no clothes and threw away all
the mesh available . To this day nobody can apply a time varying field
and note that it radiated more efficiently than any radiater known and
occupy a smaller volume than previously .possible thus preventing
those with small gardens become such loud mouths as others were that
were preventing the advance of science.
Now the antenna industry realizes that with the gaussian knowledge
being denied to them the only resort they had for advancement was to
invent a new technology so they could carry the battle to those who
cannot accept change. Unfortunately God made only one technology for
radiation leaving the industry to ponder for another 100 years.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg