Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is
Rob wrote:
The problem is that amateurs cannot live with the fact that someone
implemented a codec that is better than what they can develop themselves.
There would be no problem when amateurs could actually develop a better
codec than AMBE. But they have not shown they can.
Everyone can put up a site with a statement that they want to develop
something and need donations. But this development needs more than
donations.
Sometimes is it better to just admit that someone did a better job than
you could have done yourself, and just pay him for the work.
I think you need to study the implications of the words 'amateur',
'professional' and 'commercial', and then have a read of the Amateur
licence.
Spike
|