| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob wrote: The problem is that amateurs cannot live with the fact that someone implemented a codec that is better than what they can develop themselves. There would be no problem when amateurs could actually develop a better codec than AMBE. But they have not shown they can. Everyone can put up a site with a statement that they want to develop something and need donations. But this development needs more than donations. Sometimes is it better to just admit that someone did a better job than you could have done yourself, and just pay him for the work. I think you need to study the implications of the words 'amateur', 'professional' and 'commercial', and then have a read of the Amateur licence. Spike |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Digital | |||
| Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Homebrew | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||